Credit Markets and the Propagation of Monetary Policy Shocks



all levels of the signal z there is either none or at most one level of accumulated
assets
as (z) above which agents become entrepreneurs.

3.3 Entrepreneurial decisions and financial intermediation

As mentioned above, entrepreneurs have to decide on the size of their firms before
they know their productivity levels for the period. Given the assumed properties
of the utility function and the assumptions of full information and no possibility of
default, any entrepreneur will choose productive capital,
k, and labor, n, so that
consumption levels are nonnegative for all possible realizations of shocks. This
means that entrepreneurial decisions are taken so that

wn + RL max [0, k a] (1 δ) a + zf (k, n) + RD max [0, a k].    (6)

This constraint implies that entrepreneurs with a low level of accumulated assets
may be constrained and run their firms below their optimal size. Nevertheless,
because of the properties assumed for
Q, becoming an entrepreneur has a future
value. That is, an entrepreneur is willing to sacrifice current consumption for
having the possibility of starting a career that increases the firm’s return over
time. The way to obtain this return profile is by investing a large share of his
income and wealth so as to relax the credit constraint in order to run the firm at
its optimal size.

There are two frictions that affect the production decisions of entrepreneurs.
The first distortion is characterized by the financial constraint (6) which makes
some entrepreneurs run projects with size lower than what it is efficient. To under-
stand the role of the financial constraint, let
R be the opportunity cost of capital
which could be equal to
RL or RD depending on whether the entrepreneur is a
borrower or a depositor. For an unconstrained agent, the first order conditions
with respect to inputs are given by

u0(c)[z0fk (k, n) R] Q(z, dz0)=0

and

u0(c)[z0fn (k, n) w] Q(z, dz0)=0.

These two expressions produce the optimal capital to output ratio, q .Forthe
production function (1), the optimal capital to output ratio is given by

_ ku (z)   α α \ w

q nu (z)   y 1 α) R

17



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
3. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
4. Are Public Investment Efficient in Creating Capital Stocks in Developing Countries?
5. A Classical Probabilistic Computer Model of Consciousness
6. Kharaj and land proprietary right in the sixteenth century: An example of law and economics
7. Testing Panel Data Regression Models with Spatial Error Correlation
8. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.
9. Outsourcing, Complementary Innovations and Growth
10. Regional differentiation in the Russian federation: A cluster-based typification
11. The name is absent
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Expectation Formation and Endogenous Fluctuations in Aggregate Demand
15. The Veblen-Gerschenkron Effect of FDI in Mezzogiorno and East Germany
16. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
17. EFFICIENCY LOSS AND TRADABLE PERMITS
18. EMU's Decentralized System of Fiscal Policy
19. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information
20. WP RR 17 - Industrial relations in the transport sector in the Netherlands