ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.



RbL2 0, RbH2 0

V2 is the net present value of Firm 2’s project, net of agency costs, when
Firm 2 is “bad”. Let us assume:

V 2 < 0

A bad-type Firm 2 is never worth funding. This means that the Coase
problem will not arise if, in the process of funding Firm
1, the venture capitalist
receives a bad signal about Firm 2.

Funding a good-type Firm 2 yields V2 to the venture capitalist, where V2 is
as de
fined in section 3.2. We assume that condition (1) holds, i.e. the venture
capitalist is tempted to fund
firm 1’s rival whenever he receives good signals
about its pro
fitability (and holds the ”second best claim” in Firm 1).

Contracts

The financial contract with Firm 1 can be made contingent on the signal
observed at stage 2. Ther
nefore, a contract sopecifies the firm’s payoffs in each
possible state of nature:
RL, RH, Rb, Rb . RL (RH) is the entrepreneur’s
reward in case of failure (success), contingent on a bad signal being observed at
stage 2, and
RL ( RH) is the entrepreneur’s reward in case of failure (success)
contingent on a good signal being observed at stage 2.

The optimal contract to be offered to Firm 1 will solve the following pro-
gram:

h       -H                -L i

MaxRH RL RH RL ee αhe(RH - Rb ) + (1 - e)(RL - Rb ). +
Rb ,Rb ,Rb ,Rb ,e,e    h                                                  i

(1 α) e(RH RH) + (1 e)(RL RL) Ii

(IR )            e RH + (1 e) RL Ψ(e) W

(IR)            eRbH + (1 e)RL Ψ(e) W

(IC)             RH RL = Ψ0(e), RH RL = 'I' e

(ICi)             e(RH RH) + (1 e)(RL RL) ≥

(e ∆)(RH Rb ) + (1 e + ∆)(RL Rb ) + V2

(LL)             RL 0, RH 0, RL 0, RH 0

We will refer to this as the venture capitalist’s program. According to
whether a good or a bad signal is observed at stage 2, e
ffort e or e is im-
plemented. As the entrepreneur may abandon the project after the signal is
observed, the contract must satisfy his
ex-post participation constraints IR
and IR: not only must the entrepreneur be willing to accept the contract at
date
1, but he also must continue the project after receiving a bad or a good
signal about his potential rival.
(IC),thefirm’s incentive constraint, gives the

25



More intriguing information

1. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
2. Do imputed education histories provide satisfactory results in fertility analysis in the Western German context?
3. Olive Tree Farming in Jaen: Situation With the New Cap and Comparison With the Province Income Per Capita.
4. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Top-Down Mass Analysis of Protein Tyrosine Nitration: Comparison of Electron Capture Dissociation with “Slow-Heating” Tandem Mass Spectrometry Methods
8. I nnovative Surgical Technique in the Management of Vallecular Cyst
9. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
10. The name is absent