|
Table 17.A Estim |
ated resource use |
and costs per acre for field |
operat |
ions, Potato (I |
rish), |
fresh mar |
ket, one-row equipment, |
average | |||||||
|
TRACTOR COST |
_____E_Q_U_I_P__C_O_S_T_ |
ALLOC LABOR |
OPERATING |
INPUT | |||||||||||
|
OPERATION/ |
SIZE/ |
TRACTOR |
PERF |
TIMES |
TOTAL | ||||||||||
|
--------- |
----- |
------ |
-------- |
------ |
------- |
-------- |
------- | ||||||||
|
OPERATING INPUT |
UNIT |
SIZE |
RATE |
OVER |
MT H |
DIRECT |
FIXED |
DIRECT |
FIXED |
HOURS |
COST |
AMOUNT |
--P-RI-C-E-- |
COST |
COST |
|
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- |
_-_-_-d_o_l__l |
_a_rs_-__-_- |
_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_ |
__d_o_l_l_a_r_s_ |
_-_-_--_-_-__- |
_d_o_l_la__rs__- |
_-_-_--_-_-__- | ||||||||
|
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
43 |
0.570 |
3.00 |
Jan |
8.68 |
4.38 |
1.13 |
1.61 |
1.881 |
14.11 |
29.90 | |||
|
Hip1p3e-r1-3f-e1r3t 1R |
3 ft |
23 |
1.550 |
1.00 |
Jan |
5.71 |
2.56 |
0.91 |
1.29 |
1.705 |
12.79 |
23.26 | |||
|
lb |
800.000 0 |
0.12 |
96.00 |
96.00 | |||||||||||
|
Hipper 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Feb |
5.63 |
2.53 |
0.5 0 |
0.7 2 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
22.01 | |||
|
Row conditioner 1R |
6 ft |
23 |
0.410 |
1.00 |
Feb |
1.51 |
0.68 |
0.08 |
0.12 |
0.451 |
3.38 |
5.77 | |||
|
10 ft |
23 |
1.000 |
1.00 |
Feb |
3.68 |
1.65 |
0.40 |
1.43 |
1.100 |
8.25 |
15.41 | ||||
|
Planting labor |
hour |
14.000 0 |
7.50 |
105.00 |
105.00 | ||||||||||
|
cwt |
11.0000 |
15.00 |
165.00 |
165.00 | |||||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Fe b |
0.7 0 |
0.31 |
0.2 6 |
0.2 8 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
Dual Sencor 4L |
pt |
21..000000 00 |
177..87 53 |
15.70 17.73 |
15.70 17.73 | ||||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.19 0 |
1.0 0 |
Ma r |
0.7 0 |
0.31 |
0.2 6 |
0.2 8 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
Pounce |
3 pftt 3% lb |
0.500 0 |
21.00 |
10.50 |
10.50 | ||||||||||
|
Cult-fert 1R |
2 3 |
1.610 |
1.0 0 |
Ma r |
5.9 3 |
2.66 |
0.5 7 |
0.8 1 |
1.771 |
13.2 8 |
23.24 | ||||
|
Ammonium Nitrate 3 |
100.000 0 |
0.13 |
13.00 |
13.00 | |||||||||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
2 3 |
0.190 |
1.0 0 |
Apr |
0.7 0 |
0.31 |
0.2 6 |
0.2 8 |
0.209 |
1.5 7 |
3.12 | |||
|
CuBlrtaivvoator 1R |
3 pftt |
0.750 0 |
6.38 |
4.79 |
4.79 | ||||||||||
|
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
Apr |
5.6 3 |
2.53 |
0.4 0 |
0.5 7 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
21.76 | |||||
|
Boom sprayer |
12 ft |
23 |
0.190 |
1.00 |
May |
0.70 |
0.31 |
0.26 |
0.28 |
0.209 |
1.57 |
3.12 | |||
|
Pounce |
pt |
0.500 0 |
21.00 |
10.50 |
10.50 | ||||||||||
|
lb |
0.7500 |
2.95 |
2.21 |
2.21 | |||||||||||
|
Cultivator 1R |
3 ft |
2 3 |
1.530 |
1.0 0 |
May |
5.6 3 |
2.53 |
0.4 0 |
0.5 7 |
1.683 |
12.6 2 |
21.76 | |||
|
Shredder 1R |
5 ft |
23 |
0.740 |
1.00 |
Jun |
2.72 |
1.22 |
0.28 |
0.74 |
0.814 |
6.11 |
11.08 | |||
|
Potato digger, chain |
1 row |
23 |
1.500 |
1.00 |
Jun |
5.52 |
2.48 |
2.77 |
3.94 |
1.650 |
12.38 |
27.09 | |||
|
Trailer utility |
10 ft |
23 |
1.000 |
1.00 |
Jun |
3.68 |
1.65 |
0.40 |
1.43 |
1.100 |
8.25 |
15.41 | |||
|
Harvest labor |
hour |
28.000 0 |
7.50 |
210.00 |
210.00 | ||||||||||
|
Harvest crate |
each |
30.0000 |
1.90 |
57.00 |
57.00 | ||||||||||
|
Packing labor |
hour |
22.0000 |
7.50 |
165.00 |
165.00 | ||||||||||
|
Packing sacks |
each |
300.0000 |
0.50 |
150.00 |
150.00 | ||||||||||
|
Pickup truck |
½ ton |
01..507000 |
7.0 0 |
Jun |
29.0 9 |
23.5 4 |
71..2005 04 |
52.5 0 |
105.13 | ||||||
|
Disk 2R |
6 ft |
4 3 |
2.00 |
Jun |
5.7 9 |
2.92 |
0.75 |
1.07 |
9.40 |
19.94 | |||||
|
TOTALS |
- -6-2--.-9-1 -- |
-2-9-.0-6- - |
------ 38.75 |
---3-8-.-9-6 |
-2-4-.6-1-1- |
--1-8-4-.-5-8 |
-1-0-2-2.--43- |
-1-3-76-.-6--9 | |||||||
|
INTEREST ON OPERATING CAPITAL |
29.97 | ||||||||||||||
|
UNALLOCATED LABOR |
0.00 | ||||||||||||||
|
1406.66 | |||||||||||||||
H-36
More intriguing information
1. CREDIT SCORING, LOAN PRICING, AND FARM BUSINESS PERFORMANCE2. The name is absent
3. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
4. EDUCATIONAL ACTIVITIES IN TENNESSEE ON WATER USE AND CONTROL - AGRICULTURAL PHASES
5. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Neural Network Modelling of Constrained Spatial Interaction Flows
9. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
10. The Trade Effects of MERCOSUR and The Andean Community on U.S. Cotton Exports to CBI countries