Jenson, R.L., and L.D. Newsom. “Effect of Stink Bug-Damaged Soybean Seeds on Germination, Emergence,
and Yield.” J. Econ. Entomology, 65(1972):261-264.
Kogan, M., and H.N. Pitre, Jr. “General Sampling Methods for Above-ground Populations of Soybean
Arthropods.” Sampling Methods in Soybean Entomology, M. Kogan and D.C. Herzog, eds. New York:
Springer-Verlog, 1980.
McPherson, R.M., L.D. Newsom, and B.F. Farthing. “Evaluation of Four Stink Bug Species from Three
Genera Affecting Soybean Quality and Yield in Louisiana.” J. Econ. Entomology, 72(1979):188-194.
McPherson, R.M., and L.D. Newsom. “Trap Crops for Control of Stink Bugs in Soybean.” J. Georgia
EntomologySoc. 19(1984):470-480.
Segerson, K. “Liability for Groundwater Contamination from Pesticides.” J. Environ. Econ. and Management,
19(1990): 227-243.
Szmedra, P.I., M.E. Wetzstein, R.W. McClendon. “The Economic Threshold Under Risk: A Case Study of
Soybean Production.” J. Econ. Entomology, 83(1990):641-646.
Todd, J. W. “Effects of Stink Bug Damage on Soybean Quality” In Soybean Seed Quality and Stand
Establishment, J.B. Sinclair and J. A. Jackobs, eds. INTSOY Series Number 22, College of Agriculture,
University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 1982.
Tumipseed, S.G., andM. Kogan. “Soybean Entomology.” Ann. Rev. of Entomology, 21(1976):247-282.
U.S. Department of Agriculture. Agricultural Statistics. 1982,1984,1986,1988.
Wetzstein, M.E., and T.J. Centner. “Regulating Agricultural Contamination of Groundwater Through Strict
Liability and Negligence Legislation.” J. Environ. Econ. and Management, 22(1992):1-11.
Wetzstein, M.E., P.I. Szmedra, R.W. McClendon, and D.M. Edwards. “Efficiency Criteria and RiskAversion:
An Empirical Evaluation.” So. J. Agr. Econ. 20(1988): 171-178.
Wier, A.T., and D.J. Boethel. “Control of Southern Green Stink Bug on Soybean, 1989.” Insecticide and
Acaricide Tests, 15(1990):289-290.
94
More intriguing information
1. Macro-regional evaluation of the Structural Funds using the HERMIN modelling framework2. Correlation Analysis of Financial Contagion: What One Should Know Before Running a Test
3. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
4. TECHNOLOGY AND REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT: THE CASE OF PATENTS AND FIRM LOCATION IN THE SPANISH MEDICAL INSTRUMENTS INDUSTRY.
5. Distribution of aggregate income in Portugal from 1995 to 2000 within a SAM (Social Accounting Matrix) framework. Modeling the household sector
6. The Dynamic Cost of the Draft
7. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
8. Distortions in a multi-level co-financing system: the case of the agri-environmental programme of Saxony-Anhalt
9. Estimated Open Economy New Keynesian Phillips Curves for the G7
10. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models