so
j I I I I I I I I [—
Il ¢.2 OJ 0.6 0.8
CtinuhliH Probabilily
□ Scout + Control O Peoncap M
Figure 2. Cumulative Probabilty Functions for Yield, All Regions
for damage in 1989. A reason that Penncap M
entered the efficient set for profit in the separate
years and did not entered when the years are com-
bined is the low minimum level of profits in 1988 for
Scout and Karate, $-91.75 and $-87.82, respectively,
compared to Penncap M, $-81.12. This prevents
both Scout and Karate from dominating Penncap M
in terms of SSD analysis; however, in 1988 both
insecticides dominate Penncap M under EV analy-
sis.1 In 1989, of the three insecticides, Scout,
1A necessary condition for one distribution to SSD dominate another is that the smallest value of a dominant distribution cannot
be less than the smallest value of a dominated distribution.
91
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Nach der Einführung von Arbeitslosengeld II: deutlich mehr Verlierer als Gewinner unter den Hilfeempfängern
3. DEMAND FOR MEAT AND FISH PRODUCTS IN KOREA
4. Eigentumsrechtliche Dezentralisierung und institutioneller Wettbewerb
5. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
6. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
7. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
8. NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION
9. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
10. On the estimation of hospital cost: the approach