The name is absent

so

for damage in 1989. A reason that Penncap M
entered the efficient set for profit in the separate
years and did not entered when the years are com-
bined is the low minimum level of profits in 1988 for
Scout and Karate, $-91.75 and $-87.82, respectively,

compared to Penncap M, $-81.12. This prevents
both Scout and Karate from dominating Penncap M
in terms of SSD analysis; however, in 1988 both
insecticides dominate Penncap M under EV analy-
sis.¹ In 1989, of the three insecticides, Scout,