The name is absent



Considering producers’ possible aversion to risk,
SSD efficient sets for combined years 1988 and 1989
are listed in Table 7. Assuming nothing about the
probability distributions of either profit, yield, or
damage, risk averse southeastern soybean producers
may replace methyl parathion (Penncap M) with the
risk efficient chemicals Scout and Baythroid and
possibly reduce environmental and human health
degradation. Both Scout and Baythroid are Cate-
gory 3 toxic chemicals compared to Penncap M, a
Category 2 chemical. Figure 1 illustrates the profit
cumulative probability functions for this risk effi-
cient set, Scout and Baythroid, compared with func-
tions for Penncap M and the control. In terms of
yield, less toxic Scout may also replace methyl para-
thion (Penncap M), and less toxic Scout or Baythroid
may be used to lower damage. The cumulative prob-
ability functions for yield and damage associated
with the risk efficient sets compared to Penncap M
and the control are illustrated in Figures 2 and 3,
respectively.

Penncap M is only risk efficient in terms of profit
and yield for Florida stink bug control compared
with Georgia and Louisiana when the years are com-
bined, and in terms of controlling Florida stink bug
damage Penncap M did not enter the risk efficient
set. Risk-averse Florida producers might select
Scout, Baythroid, or Karate as a replacement to
Penncap M when considering profit or yield. They
might also use Scout or Orthene for damage control.

Table 7. Second Degree Stochastic Dominant Efficient Sets

Year________________

_______Region_________

Profit_____________

Yield

Damage_____

1988 and 1989

All Regions®

Scout

Baythroidb

S∞utb

Scoutb

Baythroid

Florida

Scout
Karateb

Penncap M

Baythroid

Scout

Karateb

Penncap M

Baythroid

Scout

Ortheneb

Georgia

Scout

Baythroidb

S∞ut
Orthene
Baythroidb

Baythroidb

Louisiana

Orthene

Baythroidb

Ortheneb

Baythroidb

1988

All Regions

Scoutb
Karate
Penncap M

Scoutb
Karate
Penncap M

Scoutb
Orthene
Baythroid

Florida

Karateb

Penncap M

Karateb

Penncap M

Scout
Ortheneb
Baythroid

Georgia

Scout
Karate
Baythroidb

Scout

Baythroidb

Scoutb
Karateb

Louisiana

Karate
Baythroid
Cymbushb

Karate

Orthene

Cymbushb

Baythroidb

1989

All Regions

Scout
Orthene
Baythroidb

Scout

Ortheneb

Penncap Mb
Baythroid

Florida

Controlb

Karateb
Baythroid
Control

Scoutb

Georgia

Scout

Baythroidb

Scout
Orthene
Baythroidb

Penncap M
Baythroidb

________Louisiana________

______Ortheneb______

Ortheneb_______

______Karateb________

“All regions denote the three states Florida, Georgia, and Louisiana.
bEfficient chemical based on maximum expected value criterion.

89



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
3. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
4. Social Balance Theory
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Kharaj and land proprietary right in the sixteenth century: An example of law and economics
13. The name is absent
14. Structural Influences on Participation Rates: A Canada-U.S. Comparison
15. Biologically inspired distributed machine cognition: a new formal approach to hyperparallel computation
16. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
17. Robust Econometrics
18. AN EMPIRICAL INVESTIGATION OF THE PRODUCTION EFFECTS OF ADOPTING GM SEED TECHNOLOGY: THE CASE OF FARMERS IN ARGENTINA
19. Spatial Aggregation and Weather Risk Management
20. Migration and employment status during the turbulent nineties in Sweden