The name is absent



Table 1. Toxicity of Methyl Parathion and Alternative Insecticides

Insecticides____________________

Toxicity Categoryb______

________________Acute LDsoVaIuesa_________________

Oral (mg.∕kg.)
_______
White Rats_________

Dermal (mg.∕kg.)
_________
Rabbits__________

Ambush (permethrin)

3

>4,000

>2,000

Asana (esfenvalerate)

2

458

2,000

Baythroid (CyfIuthrin)

3

590

5,000 (Rat)

Cymbush (Cypermethrin)

3

251 (Corn Oil)

1,600 (Rat)

Karate (Iambda-CyhaIothrin)

2

64

2,000

Methyl Parathion

1

9-25

300-400

Orthene (acephate)

3

866-945

>10,250

Penncap M
(micro-encapusulated
methly parathion)

2

>60

>1,200

Scout (tralomethrin)___________

___________3______________

________1,070-1,250________

________>2,000___________

Source: EPA and Georgia Cooperative Extension Service

aToxicity is measured in LD50, the dosage of a substance where 50 percent of the exposed test animals are killed. The
lower the LD60, the greater the toxicity. The oral dosage for Cymbush was mixed with corn oil, and the dermal test for
Baythroid and Cymbush was performed on white rats.

bToxicity categories 1,2, and 3 are associated with highly, moderately and slightly toxic insecticides, respectively.

applications 20 days prior to grazing or hay and/or
bean harvest. Currently, methyl parathion is still
labeled for use on soybeans, but its status is under
EPA review. With environmental awareness increas-
ing, resulting in possibly increased producer liability
from pesticide applications, the substitution of less
toxic chemicals is desirable both for producers and
consumers (Segerson; Wetzstein and Cenmer).

Given that the patent for methyl parathion expired
in the late 1980s, neither the past producer, Mon-
santo Agricultural Products Company, nor other
U.S.-based companies have indicated an interest in
continued manufacture of the product. In the future,
as the insecticide becomes less readily available, its
price may increase. This potential scarcity may par-
tially account for the cost of five gallons of emulsi-
fiable concentrate (4 lb.∕gal.) methyl parathion
increasing from $69.10 in 1987 to $89.90 in 1989
(Georgia Crop Reporting Service). Though alterna-
tive insecticides have potential for controlling cer-
tain stink bug species, and, as indicated in Table 1,
these insecticides may be less toxic, there exists
limited research on their economic feasibility.

Highly toxic insecticides, including methyl para-
thion, may be effective in controlling stink bugs but
environmentally hazardous, whereas less environ-
mentally toxic insecticides may be ineffective for
stink bug control. Furthermore, producers’ attitudes
toward risk associated with variability in profit,
yield, and soybean damage may determine which
chemicals could be feasible alternatives for methyl
parathion. This choice under risk caused by interac-
tion among economic, environmental, and technical
considerations may be addressed from a risk analysis
perspective.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the research presented in this
paper was to identify the risk-efficient set of stink
bug insecticide controls in the southeastern United
States. Data for this analysis were derived from
1988 and 1989 field experiments in Florida, Georgia,
and Louisiana. Stochastic dominance and expected
value analyses were used in determining risk effi-
cient sets.

STINK BUG CONTROL FIELD
EXPERIMENTS

In 1988 and 1989, similar field experiments were
conducted at agricultural experiment stations in
Florida, Georgia, and Louisiana. At each location,
two soybean varieties were planted in mid-May with
a conventional wide-row cropping system. One of
the varieties was an early maturing Group V variety,
Forrest, which was used to lure the stink bugs into
the test area (McPherson and Newsom). The other
variety was a later maturing Group VΠ variety, either
Bragg or Braxton. The late-maturing variety was
partitioned into a randomized block design with four
replications. Stink bug controls were randomly ar-
ranged within each replication in plots that measured
30 by 50 feet (0.034 acre). Two separate test loca-
tions were used in Louisiana and Georgia in 1989



More intriguing information

1. A methodological approach in order to support decision-makers when defining Mobility and Transportation Politics
2. Keynesian Dynamics and the Wage-Price Spiral:Estimating a Baseline Disequilibrium Approach
3. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
4. The name is absent
5. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
6. The name is absent
7. ISSUES IN NONMARKET VALUATION AND POLICY APPLICATION: A RETROSPECTIVE GLANCE
8. The Clustering of Financial Services in London*
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
12. Self-Help Groups and Income Generation in the Informal Settlements of Nairobi
13. MANAGEMENT PRACTICES ON VIRGINIA DAIRY FARMS
14. Short report "About a rare cause of primary hyperparathyroidism"
15. Non-farm businesses local economic integration level: the case of six Portuguese small and medium-sized Markettowns• - a sector approach
16. The Formation of Wenzhou Footwear Clusters: How Were the Entry Barriers Overcome?
17. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry