The name is absent



rigorous test for technical sufficiency. However, such
conclusions seem to suggest a state of existing
provincialism within the profession which has, in my
opinion, seriously limited development of an
important evolutionary process in American
agriculture. Therefore, the present status and realized
gains from producer bargaining must be viewed in the
context of our own lack of faith which may well have
been the most serious obstacle which the bargaining
movement in agriculture has encountered, and may
continue as its greatest challenge.

REFERENCES

[ 1] AssociatedMilkProducers, Inc., 1972 Annual Report.

[ 2] Brandow, G. E., “Market Power and its Sources in the Food Industry,” American Journal OfAgricultural
Economics,
51:1-12, Feb. 1969.

[ 3] Brandow, G. E., “The Place of Bargaining in American Agriculture,” Cooperative Bargaining, Service
Report 113, FCS, USDA, Aug. 1970.

[ 4] Breimyer, Harold F., “How much Market Power Does Southwest Agriculture Have? More Than You
Think,”
Market Power for Agriculture in the Southwest, College Station, Texas, Texas A&M University
Press, 1968, p. 10.

[ 5 ] Cooperative Bargaining, Service Report 113, FCS, USDA, Aug. 1970.

[ 6] Fellner, William, Competition Among the Few, New York, Augustus M. Kelley, 1965, Ch.l.

[ 7] Galbraith, J. K., The New Industrial State, HoughtonMifflin Co., 1967, Ch. 1-2.

[ 8] Gifford, Claude W., “When Does Cooperative Bargaining Really Get Underway?” in Proceeding of the
Fifteenth National Conference of Bargaining Cooperatives,
FCS, USDA, Jan. 1971, Washington, p. 43.

[ 9] Hoos, Sidney, “Collective Bargaining in Agriculture-Problems, Progress and Prospects,” Bargaining in
Agriculture,
AE No. 344, Ohio State University, March, 1963, pp. 34-62.

[10] Knutson, Ronald D., Cooperative Bargaining Developments in the Dairy Industry, 1960-70, FCS Research
Report No. 19, FCS, USDA, Aug. 1971.

[11] Machiavelli, Niccolo, The Prince, London, Oxford University Press, 1935.

[12] McMillan, Wendall M., Cooperative Bargaining by Farmers, General Report No. 123, FCS, USDA, July,
1964.

[13] Paarlberg, Don, “Bargaining as a Means of Improving Farm Income,” Proceedings of the Fourteenth
National Conference of Bargaining Cooperatives,
FCS, USDA, June, 1970.

[14] Padberg, D. I., “Organizational Needs for Collective Bargaining,” Bargaining in Agriculture, North Central
Regional Ext. Pub. 30, June, 1971, pp. 19-23.

[15] Ruttan, Vernon W., Bargaining Power for Farmers, Staff Paper P 68-1, University of Minnesota, May, 1968.

[16] SchneiderjVernon E., “Bargaining in Agriculture: Discussion,” Joumalof Farm Economics, 46:1276-1279,
Dec. 1964.

[17] University of Missouri, Bargaining in Agriculture, North Central Regional Ext. Pub. 30, June, 1971.

43



More intriguing information

1. Behaviour-based Knowledge Systems: An Epigenetic Path from Behaviour to Knowledge
2. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
3. Improvements in medical care and technology and reductions in traffic-related fatalities in Great Britain
4. The name is absent
5. How we might be able to understand the brain
6. Knowledge, Innovation and Agglomeration - regionalized multiple indicators and evidence from Brazil
7. The name is absent
8. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
12. PROTECTING CONTRACT GROWERS OF BROILER CHICKEN INDUSTRY
13. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations
14. Commitment devices, opportunity windows, and institution building in Central Asia
15. A Study of Prospective Ophthalmology Residents’ Career Perceptions
16. Permanent and Transitory Policy Shocks in an Empirical Macro Model with Asymmetric Information
17. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
18. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
19. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
20. The name is absent