AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD



360


NAFTA - Report Card on Agriculture

Table 11: Agreement as to Whether NAFTA Promoted Conditions of
Fair Competition in Agriculture--Percent Response for Each
__________
Report Card by Country and Total.________________________

Country

Canada

United States

Mexico

Tofa/

Report Card

^st 2nd

^st 2πd

^st 2nd

γst 2nd

Response_____

o/

_____/O______

%______

%

%______

Strongly Agree

35 27

35 44

— 33

32 35

Slightly Agree

53 73

60 50

10067

61 62

Neutral

12 —

— 6

— —

5 3

Slightly Disagree

— —

— —

— —

— —

Strongly Disagree

— —

— —

— —

— —

Don’t Know

— —

5 —

— —

2 —

Source: Compiled from response data.

cent of respondents either strongly or slightly agreed that NAFTA had pro-
moted fair competition, with some variation both among countries and between
report cards as can be seen in Table 11. Thus, the workshop report cards give
NAFTA strong marks for promoting conditions of fair competition in agricul-
ture.

Reduction of Trade-distorting Subsidies

The report cards asked two questions concerning whether NAFTA had
helped reduce trade-distorting subsidies, the first question focusing on the
participant’s home country and the second on other NAFTA countries. When
asked to what extent they agreed that NAFTA had helped reduce trade-distort-
ing subsidies in their own country, three-fourths of workshop participants from
Mexico strongly agreed and one-fourth slightly agreed in the first report card,
changing to two-thirds strongly agreeing and one-third slightly agreeing in the
second report card (Table 12).

In response to the same question, Canadian workshop participants also
tended to strongly (35 percent) or slightly (53 percent) agree, with 12 percent
expressing neutrality on the subject (Table 13). Following the workshop, the
majority (67 percent) of Canadian workshop participants strongly agreed that
NAFTA had helped reduce trade-distorting subsidies in their country, com-
pared to one-third who slightly agreed. In both report cards, a smaller propor-
tion of participants from the United States strongly agreed (20 to 25 percent)
and slightly agreed (50 to 55 percent) that NAFTA had helped reduce trade-



More intriguing information

1. Update to a program for saving a model fit as a dataset
2. Testing for One-Factor Models versus Stochastic Volatility Models
3. Volunteering and the Strategic Value of Ignorance
4. Imitation in location choice
5. Text of a letter
6. NVESTIGATING LEXICAL ACQUISITION PATTERNS: CONTEXT AND COGNITION
7. Inhimillinen pääoma ja palkat Suomessa: Paluu perusmalliin
8. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
9. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
10. SLA RESEARCH ON SELF-DIRECTION: THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ISSUES
11. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
12. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
13. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
14. The name is absent
15. Road pricing and (re)location decisions households
16. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
17. The name is absent
18. CGE modelling of the resources boom in Indonesia and Australia using TERM
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent