21
Table 5. Welfare Effects of the Andean Price Band Systems: "Historical Policy" Scenario for Selected Products in Colombia,
Ecuador and Venezuela
Product |
Country |
Share of AC |
Risk Benefits |
Transfer |
Net Producer |
Maize |
Colombia |
40% |
-2.09% |
4.92% |
2.83% |
Ecuador |
21% |
3.23% |
42.67% |
45.90% | |
Venezuela |
39% |
-1.07% |
29.67% |
28.60% | |
Weighted Average |
0.59% |
22.41% |
______21.82% | ||
Rice |
Colombia |
50% |
4.13% |
11.06% |
15.19% |
Ecuador |
31% |
1.65% |
23.68% |
25.33% | |
Venezuela |
19% |
-4.28% |
68.63% |
64.34% | |
Weighted Average |
1.77% |
25.85% |
______27.62% | ||
Sugar |
Colombia |
70% |
3.80% |
-49.88% |
-46.08% |
Ecuador |
12% |
3.13% |
7.46% |
10.59% | |
Venezuela |
18% |
3.82% |
21.94% |
25.77% | |
Weighted Average |
3.72% |
-29.76% |
-26.04% |
More intriguing information
1. Une Classe de Concepts2. Ruptures in the probability scale. Calculation of ruptures’ values
3. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
4. The name is absent
5. Barriers and Limitations in the Development of Industrial Innovation in the Region
6. The name is absent
7. Bridging Micro- and Macro-Analyses of the EU Sugar Program: Methods and Insights
8. The effect of classroom diversity on tolerance and participation in England, Sweden and Germany
9. The name is absent
10. Searching Threshold Inflation for India