CONSUMER ACCEPTANCE OF GENETICALLY MODIFIED FOODS



Uij = u (yj, Zj, εij)
where i is the dichotomous choice (1 as the preferred state and 0 the status quo) and j refers to
respondent. The determinants of utility are y
j, the jth respondent’s income, Zj, a vector of
respondent characteristics and attributes of the choice, and ε
ij, a component of preferences known
to the individual respondent but not observed by the researcher.

(1)


Based on this model, respondent j chooses the non-GM food if the utility of non-GM
food exceeds the utility of the status quo (GM food), given prices:

Uij(Zj, yj - Pngmj,1, εij) > Uoj (Zj, yj — Pgmj, 0, sj                         (2)

where 1 denotes the respondent j choosing the non-GM food, 0 denotes the respondent j
choosing the status quo (GM food), Pngm
j is the price of non-GM food, Pgmj is the price of GM
food. All other variables were defined previously.

Therefore, the probability that the respondent thinks he/she is better off by choosing the
non-GM food, given its price can be expressed as:

Prob (Respondent j chooses non-GM food)

= Prob [Uij(Zj, yj — Pngmj,1, ɛɪj) > Uoj (Zj, yj — Pgmj,0, ɛoj)]                            (3)

The Logistic Model

With a further assumption of the linear form for the utility function, the utility of
respondent j choosing the non-GM food can be specified as:

U1j = α1Zj + β1 (Yj - Pngmj) + ε1j                                            (4)

And the utility of respondent j choosing the GM food is:

U0j = α0Zj + β0 (Yj - Pgmj) + ε0j                                              (5)



More intriguing information

1. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
2. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
3. Orientation discrimination in WS 2
4. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
5. The migration of unskilled youth: Is there any wage gain?
6. Evolution of cognitive function via redeployment of brain areas
7. On the Desirability of Taxing Charitable Contributions
8. The name is absent
9. The WTO and the Cartagena Protocol: International Policy Coordination or Conflict?
10. The name is absent