Figure 1: Technical Efficiency Rankings
Efficiency Score for each Firm
0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1.0
Firm (Group) 1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1---------1
1(4) -----------------
11(4) ------------------
10(4) --------------------
9(4) ---------------------
13(3) ------------------------
16(3) -------------------------
2(3) --------------------------
12(3) --------------------------
27(3) --------------------------
10(3) ---------------------------
3(3) ---------------------------
22(3) ----------------------------
34(3) -----------------------------
35(3) -----------------------------
41(3) ----------------------------
8(3) ------------------------------
33(3) ------------------------------
6(3) ------------------------------
32(3) ------------------------------
20(3) ------------------------------
4(3) -------------------------------
18(2) --------------------------------
42(3) -------------------------------
39(2) --------------------------------
21(2) ---------------------------------
43(2) --------------------------------
30(2) ----------------------------------
14(2) ----------------------------------
36(2) -----------------------------------
5(2) ------------------------------------
7(2) ------------------------------------
40(2) -----------------------------------
25(2) ------------------------------------
37(2) ------------------------------------
38(2) ---------------------------------------
23(2) ----------------------------------------
28(1) -----------------------------------------
15(1) ------------------------------------------
26(1) ----------------------------------------------
24(1) ----------------------------------------------
29(1) -------------------------------------------------
19(1) ---------------------------------------------------
31(1) ------------------------------------------------------
35
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. AGRICULTURAL TRADE IN THE URUGUAY ROUND: INTO FINAL BATTLE
6. Does South Africa Have the Potential and Capacity to Grow at 7 Per Cent?: A Labour Market Perspective
7. Placentophagia in Nonpregnant Nulliparous Mice: A Genetic Investigation1
8. Demographic Features, Beliefs And Socio-Psychological Impact Of Acne Vulgaris Among Its Sufferers In Two Towns In Nigeria
9. Placenta ingestion by rats enhances y- and n-opioid antinociception, but suppresses A-opioid antinociception
10. The name is absent