MULTIPLE COMPARISONS WITH THE BEST: BAYESIAN PRECISION MEASURES OF EFFICIENCY RANKINGS



Table 1: Utilities in the Sample

Firm Number

Utility

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

Alabama PC
Arizona PSC
Arkansas PLC
Pacific GEC
SanDiego GEC
PSC Colorado
UIC Connecticut
Delmarva PLC
Potomac EPC
Tampa EC
Georgia PC
C Illinois PSC
PSC Indiana
PC Iowa
Kansas GEC
Kentucky UC
Louisville GEC
C Louisiana EC
C Maine PC
Baltimore GEC
Boston EC
Detroit EC
Mississippi PLC
Kansas City PLC
PSC New Hampshire
Atlantic City EC
PSEGC New Jersey
PSC New Mexico
Central Hudson GEC
CEC New York
Rochester GEC
Carolina PLC
Duke PC
Cleveland EIC
Ohio EC

Oklahoma GEC
DLC Pennsylvania
Philadelphia PC
West Penn PC
S Carolina EGC
Virginia EPC
Appalachian PC
Wisconsin EPC

32



More intriguing information

1. Wirtschaftslage und Reformprozesse in Estland, Lettland, und Litauen: Bericht 2001
2. An Intertemporal Benchmark Model for Turkey’s Current Account
3. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
7. The name is absent
8. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?
9. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
10. GENE EXPRESSION AND ITS DISCONTENTS Developmental disorders as dysfunctions of epigenetic cognition