The first-differentiated Stone's index, ∆ logP* may be decomposed into three components:
n nn
(9) ∆ log P * = ∑ w. ∙∆ log pj + ∑ ∆ w ■ log pj - ∑ ∆ w ∙∆ log pj .
j =1j =1j =1
The second and third term are likely to be quite small since, in the context of time-series data,
shares usually do not change much from one observation to the next (Alston and Chalfant).
Substituting the first term of ∆ logP * from Equation (9) into the first-differentiated LA/AIDS in
Equation (8) yields
(10) ∆wi≈∑n γij∆logpj+βi[∆logX-∑n wj∆logpj].
j =1j =1
Equation (10) is similar to the Rotterdam model. Any difference is in the specification of the
income term. Theil and Clements (1987) refer to DQ in Equation (1) as a finite change version of
the Divisia volume index (Alston and Chalfant). It is approximately equal to
(11) DQ* =∆ log X -∆ log P ° ,
n
where ∆ log P ° = ∑ wj ■ ∆ log pj, which is similar to the first-differentiated Stone’s price index
j=1
in Equation (9). Substituting DQ* for DQ, the Rotterdam model is re-specified as follows
More intriguing information
1. The Effects of Reforming the Chinese Dual-Track Price System2. Integration, Regional Specialization and Growth Differentials in EU Acceding Countries: Evidence from Hungary
3. Nurses' retention and hospital characteristics in New South Wales, CHERE Discussion Paper No 52
4. An Investigation of transience upon mothers of primary-aged children and their school
5. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
6. Qualification-Mismatch and Long-Term Unemployment in a Growth-Matching Model
7. The name is absent
8. Constructing the Phylomemetic Tree Case of Study: Indonesian Tradition-Inspired Buildings
9. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
10. The name is absent