Stata Technical Bulletin
23
|
. sureg cl c2 c3 c4 c5 |
P | |||||
|
Equation |
Obs Parms RMSE |
"R-sq" F | ||||
|
— cl |
20 |
3 91.78166 |
0.9214 111.0618 |
0.0000 | ||
|
c2 |
20 |
3 13.27856 |
0.9136 88.06545 |
0.0000 | ||
|
c3 |
20 |
3 27.88272 |
0.7053 19.92612 |
0.0000 | ||
|
c4 |
20 |
3 10.21312 |
0.7444 25.13699 |
0.0000 | ||
|
cδ |
20 |
3 102.3053 |
0.4403 6.361697 |
0.0027 | ||
|
— I |
Coef. |
Std. Err. |
t |
p>∣t∣ |
[957. Conf. |
— Interval] |
|
---------+. |
— | |||||
|
cl I | ||||||
|
market1 ∣ |
.120493 |
.0234601 |
5.136 |
0.000 |
.0738481 |
.1671379 |
|
stockl I |
.3827462 |
.0355419 |
10.769 |
0.000 |
.3120793 |
.453413 |
|
„cons I |
-162.3641 |
97.03215 |
-1.673 |
0.098 |
-355.29 |
30.56183 |
|
—————————⅛- |
— | |||||
|
c2 I | ||||||
|
market2 ∣ |
.069S4S6 |
.0183279 |
3.795 |
0.000 |
.0331048 |
.1059864 |
|
stock2 I |
.308S44S |
.028053 |
10.999 |
0.000 |
.2527677 |
.3643213 |
|
„cons I |
.5043113 |
12.48742 |
0.040 |
0.968 |
•24.32402 |
25.33264 |
|
—————————⅛- |
— | |||||
|
c3 I | ||||||
|
market3 I |
.0372914 |
.0133012 |
2.804 |
0.006 |
.010845 |
.0637379 |
|
stock3 I |
.130783 |
.0239163 |
5.468 |
0.000 |
.083231 |
.178335 |
|
„cons I |
-22.43892 |
27.67879 |
-0.811 |
0.420 |
•77.47177 |
32.59393 |
|
—————————⅛- |
— | |||||
|
c4 I | ||||||
|
market4 ∣ |
.0570091 |
.0123241 |
4.626 |
0.000 |
.0325055 |
.0815127 |
|
stock4 I |
.0415065 |
.0446894 |
0.929 |
0.356 |
-.047348 |
.130361 |
|
„cons I |
1.088878 |
6.788627 |
0.160 |
0.873 |
•12.40873 |
14.58649 |
|
—————————⅛- |
— | |||||
|
c5 I | ||||||
|
markets I |
.1014782 |
.0594213 |
1.708 |
0.091 |
∙.0166671 |
.2196236 |
|
stocks I |
.3999914 |
.1386127 |
2.886 |
0.005 |
.1243922 |
.6755905 |
|
_cons I |
85.42324 |
121.3481 |
0.704 |
0.483 |
•155.8493 |
326.6957 |
Here, we instead estimate a random coefficients model
. use invest, clear
. xtrchh invest market stock, !(company) t(time)
Hildreth-Houck Random coefficients regression
|
— invest I |
Coef. |
Std. Err. |
z |
P>∣z∣ |
[957. Conf. |
— Interval] |
|
—————————+— |
.0807646 |
.0250829 |
3.220 |
0.001 |
.0316031 |
— .1299261 |
|
stock I |
.2839885 |
.0677899 |
4.189 |
0.000 |
.1511229 |
.4168542 |
|
_cons I |
-23.58361 |
34.55547 |
-0.682 |
0.495 |
-91.31108 |
44.14386 |
Test of parameter constancy
chi(12) = 603.994
P(X > chi) = 0.0000
Just as subjective examination of the results of our simultaneous equation model do not support the assumption of parameter
constancy, the test included with the random coefficient model also indicates that the assumption of parameter constancy is not
valid for this data. With large panel datasets obviously we would not want to take the time to look at a simultaneous equations
model (aside from the fact that our doing so was very subjective).
References
Greene, W. H. 1993. Econometric Analysis. 2d ed. New York: Macmillan.
Grunfeld, Y. and Z. Griliches. 1960. Is aggregation necessarily bad? Review of Economics and Statistics 42: 1-13.
Hildreth, C. and C. Houck. 1968. Some estimators for a linear model with random coefficients, Journal of the American Statistical Association 63:
584-595.
Johnston, J. 1984. Econometric Methods. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Swamy, P. 1970. Efficient inference in a random coefficient model. Econometrica 38: 311-328.
----. 1971. Statistical Inference in Random Coefficient Regression Models. New York: Springer-Verlag.
More intriguing information
1. Sex differences in the structure and stability of children’s playground social networks and their overlap with friendship relations2. The name is absent
3. THE CHANGING STRUCTURE OF AGRICULTURE
4. The name is absent
5. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
6. The voluntary welfare associations in Germany: An overview
7. A MARKOVIAN APPROXIMATED SOLUTION TO A PORTFOLIO MANAGEMENT PROBLEM
8. The name is absent
9. Trade Liberalization, Firm Performance and Labour Market Outcomes in the Developing World: What Can We Learn from Micro-LevelData?
10. Internationalization of Universities as Internationalization of Bildung