Stata Technical Bulletin
11
Atkinson indices, A(e), where e > 0 is the inequality aversion parameter
----------+-----------------------------------
All obs I A(0.5) A(I) A(2)
----------+-----------------------------------
I 0.09294 0.17622 0.88009
----------+-----------------------------------
Subgroup summary statistics, for each subgroup к = !,...,K:
|
----------+-. Tenure of ∣ HH I |
Pop. share |
Mean |
Rel.mean |
Income share |
— log(mean) |
|
Social r I |
0.22858 |
139.71280 |
0.59763 |
0.13661 |
4.93959 |
|
Other re I |
0.07177 |
215.92972 |
0.92366 |
0.06629 |
5.37495 |
|
Owned:mo I |
0.50177 |
279.24060 |
1.19448 |
0.59935 |
5.63207 |
|
Owned: ou I |
0.19789 |
233.61986 |
0.99933 |
0.19775 |
5.45370 |
Subgroup indices: GE_k(a) and Gini_k
|
----------+— Tenure of ∣ HH I |
GE(-1) |
GE(O) |
GE(I) |
GE (2) |
— Gini |
|
Social r I |
0.13500 |
0.09188 |
0.09317 |
0.11616 |
— 0.22864 |
|
Other re I |
0.25743 |
0.18018 |
0.17526 |
0.21131 |
0.32182 |
|
Owned:mo I |
8.32796 |
0.16025 |
0.15448 |
0.19913 |
0.29406 |
|
Owned: ou I |
0.30608 |
0.22835 |
0.29114 |
0.85230 |
0.35977 |
Within-group inequality, GE_W(a)
|
----------+— All obs I |
GE(-1) |
GE(O) |
GE(I) |
— GE (2) |
|
I |
3.63059 |
0.15953 |
0.17450 |
0.33342 |
Between-group inequality, GE.B(a):
|
----------+— All obs I |
GE(-1) |
GE(O) |
GE(I) |
— GE (2) |
|
I |
0.03913 |
0.03433 |
0.03079 |
— 0.02820 |
|
Subgroup Atkinson indices, |
A.k(e) |
— | ||
|
Tenure of ∣ |
— | |||
|
HH I |
A(0.5) |
A(I) |
A(2) | |
|
Social r I |
0.04454 |
0.08779 |
— 0.21260 | |
|
Other re I |
0.08447 |
0.16488 |
0.33987 | |
|
Owned:mo I |
0.07387 |
0.14807 |
0.94336 | |
|
Owned: ou I |
0.11666 |
0.20415 |
0.37971 | |
Within-group inequality, A_W(e)
|
----------+-------------- |
A(I) |
— A(2) | ||
|
All obs I |
A(0.5) | |||
|
— |
I |
0.07903 |
0.15204 |
0.69207 |
|
Between-group inequality, |
A.B(e) |
— | ||
|
— All |
obs I |
A(0.5) |
A(I) |
— A(2) |
|
— |
I |
0.01511 |
0.02852 |
0.61059 |
Almost 70% of the population are in households owning their own house, and this group is clearly much better off than
those in rented accommodations. Average income among owner households with a mortgage is about 20% the population average
income, in contrast with average income among social renters which is some 40% below the population average. Average income
is lower among owners-outright than among owners with a mortgage, most likely because the former group includes a much
higher proportion of older retired people.
According to most of the indices, inequality is greatest for the owned-outright group compared to the others (especially
for the more top-sensitive indices such as GE(2)) and it is lowest for the social-renting group. The former result is most likely
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
3. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
4. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
5. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
6. Proceedings of the Fourth International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics
7. Ultrametric Distance in Syntax
8. Rent Dissipation in Chartered Recreational Fishing: Inside the Black Box
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent