Stata Technical Bulletin
11
Atkinson indices, A(e), where e > 0 is the inequality aversion parameter
----------+-----------------------------------
All obs I A(0.5) A(I) A(2)
----------+-----------------------------------
I 0.09294 0.17622 0.88009
----------+-----------------------------------
Subgroup summary statistics, for each subgroup к = !,...,K:
|
----------+-. Tenure of ∣ HH I |
Pop. share |
Mean |
Rel.mean |
Income share |
— log(mean) |
|
Social r I |
0.22858 |
139.71280 |
0.59763 |
0.13661 |
4.93959 |
|
Other re I |
0.07177 |
215.92972 |
0.92366 |
0.06629 |
5.37495 |
|
Owned:mo I |
0.50177 |
279.24060 |
1.19448 |
0.59935 |
5.63207 |
|
Owned: ou I |
0.19789 |
233.61986 |
0.99933 |
0.19775 |
5.45370 |
Subgroup indices: GE_k(a) and Gini_k
|
----------+— Tenure of ∣ HH I |
GE(-1) |
GE(O) |
GE(I) |
GE (2) |
— Gini |
|
Social r I |
0.13500 |
0.09188 |
0.09317 |
0.11616 |
— 0.22864 |
|
Other re I |
0.25743 |
0.18018 |
0.17526 |
0.21131 |
0.32182 |
|
Owned:mo I |
8.32796 |
0.16025 |
0.15448 |
0.19913 |
0.29406 |
|
Owned: ou I |
0.30608 |
0.22835 |
0.29114 |
0.85230 |
0.35977 |
Within-group inequality, GE_W(a)
|
----------+— All obs I |
GE(-1) |
GE(O) |
GE(I) |
— GE (2) |
|
I |
3.63059 |
0.15953 |
0.17450 |
0.33342 |
Between-group inequality, GE.B(a):
|
----------+— All obs I |
GE(-1) |
GE(O) |
GE(I) |
— GE (2) |
|
I |
0.03913 |
0.03433 |
0.03079 |
— 0.02820 |
|
Subgroup Atkinson indices, |
A.k(e) |
— | ||
|
Tenure of ∣ |
— | |||
|
HH I |
A(0.5) |
A(I) |
A(2) | |
|
Social r I |
0.04454 |
0.08779 |
— 0.21260 | |
|
Other re I |
0.08447 |
0.16488 |
0.33987 | |
|
Owned:mo I |
0.07387 |
0.14807 |
0.94336 | |
|
Owned: ou I |
0.11666 |
0.20415 |
0.37971 | |
Within-group inequality, A_W(e)
|
----------+-------------- |
A(I) |
— A(2) | ||
|
All obs I |
A(0.5) | |||
|
— |
I |
0.07903 |
0.15204 |
0.69207 |
|
Between-group inequality, |
A.B(e) |
— | ||
|
— All |
obs I |
A(0.5) |
A(I) |
— A(2) |
|
— |
I |
0.01511 |
0.02852 |
0.61059 |
Almost 70% of the population are in households owning their own house, and this group is clearly much better off than
those in rented accommodations. Average income among owner households with a mortgage is about 20% the population average
income, in contrast with average income among social renters which is some 40% below the population average. Average income
is lower among owners-outright than among owners with a mortgage, most likely because the former group includes a much
higher proportion of older retired people.
According to most of the indices, inequality is greatest for the owned-outright group compared to the others (especially
for the more top-sensitive indices such as GE(2)) and it is lowest for the social-renting group. The former result is most likely
More intriguing information
1. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)2. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
3. Howard Gardner : the myth of Multiple Intelligences
4. BILL 187 - THE AGRICULTURAL EMPLOYEES PROTECTION ACT: A SPECIAL REPORT
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Business Cycle Dynamics of a New Keynesian Overlapping Generations Model with Progressive Income Taxation
8. A dynamic approach to the tendency of industries to cluster
9. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
10. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?