The name is absent



Stata Technical Bulletin

13


asym. t I
P > It I I

1.10935

0.26733

5.80936

0.00000

18.88962

0.00000

16.90382

0.00000

delta2 I

-0.00179

-0.00102

-0.00006

-0.00004

Var2      I

6.50902

0.00003

0.00004

0.00019

s.e.2     I

2.55128

0.00587

0.00664

0.01385

asym. t I

1.10951

32.16550

28.77771

18.38758

P > It I I

0.26726

0.00000

0.00000

0.00000

ineqfac: inequality decomposition by factor components

ineqfac provides an exact decomposition of the inequality of total income into inequality contributions from each of the
factor components of total income. More specifically, given

facvars = {factor_1 factor_2 ... factor~F}

define the variable totvar such that for each observation in the dataset,

totvar =


ɪɪ factor./
∕=ι


Shorrocks (1982a) proved that there was a unique ‘decomposition rule’ for which inequality in totvar across observations
could be expressed as the sum of inequality contributions from each of the factor components, and which also satisfied some
other basic axioms.

The decomposition rule is the “proportionate contribution of factor f to total inequality”, sʃ:

Sf = pʃɑ(faetor,/)/ɑ(totvar)

where pf is the correlation between factor./ and totvar, and σ(.) is the standard deviation. Equivalently, Sf is the slope
coefficient from the regression of factor./ on totvar. Observe that for each observation,

Σsf
f=l

Factor components with a positive value for Sf make a disequalizing contribution to inequality in total income; factor
components with negative
Sf values make an equalizing contribution.

Shorrocks (1982a) shows that choice of the decomposition rule is an issue independent of that concerning which index is
used to summarize inequality. However there happens to be a nice link with the case in which inequality is measured using the
coefficient of variation, for one can also rewrite
S f as

sf = P∕[m(factor.∕)∕m(totvar)][CV(factor.∕)CV(totvar)]

or

2f = P∕[m(factor.∕)∕m(totvar)][I'2(factor.∕)∕I'2(totvar)]'5

where m is the mean, and CV is the coefficient of variation, and 22 is half the squared coefficient of variation, or equivalently,
GE (2) as defined earlier.

Thus total inequality can be written in terms of the factor correlations with total income, the factor shares in total income
(= m(factor.∕)∕m(totvar)), and the factor inequalities (summarized using either
CV or /2).

ineqfac reports the estimates for each factor component of: Sf, Sf = s∕.GV(totvar), m(factor.∕)∕m(totvar),
GV(factor./), and GV(factor.∕)∕GV(totvar), plus, optionally, the correlations, means and standard deviations of the factor
components and totvar. Optionally, inequality is summarized using T2 rather than CV.

ineqfac was designed as a tool for income distribution analysis in the case where the current sample contains observations
on income components for each of a set of income receiving units (e.g., families, households, persons). In this case,
facvars



More intriguing information

1. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
2. The name is absent
3. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
8. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Une nouvelle vision de l'économie (The knowledge society: a new approach of the economy)
13. The name is absent
14. The Value of Cultural Heritage Sites in Armenia: Evidence From a Travel Cost Method Study
15. The name is absent
16. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)
17. Electricity output in Spain: Economic analysis of the activity after liberalization
18. Climate Policy under Sustainable Discounted Utilitarianism
19. Income Growth and Mobility of Rural Households in Kenya: Role of Education and Historical Patterns in Poverty Reduction
20. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France