Table 3. Pay gap between public and private sector: OLS results
Males |
β* = β pri |
Females |
β* = βpub | ||
β* = βpri |
β* = βpub | ||||
Predicted log wages |
ln Wpub = 2.2380 |
ln Wpri = 2.0239 |
ln Wpub = 2.1496 |
ln Wprri = 1.7358 | |
ln w pub - ln wpri |
0.2132 ** |
0.4140 ** | |||
(Xpub - Xpr )β |
0.2270 ** |
0.2215 ** |
0.1892 ** |
0.3802 ** | |
(106.0 %) |
(104.0 %) |
(46.0 %) |
(92.0 %) | ||
Xpr ( β* - βpr ) |
- |
-0.0082 |
- |
0.0338 | |
(-4.0%) |
(8.0 %) | ||||
χPub (βPu - β*) |
-0.0138 |
- |
0.2248 ** | ||
(-6.0 %) |
(54.0 %) |
- |
Note: Cross-section weights applied. *,**, and *** denote significance at 10%, 5% and 1% respectively. Standard errors in parentheses, where OLS standard
errors are robust and the s.e. for the remaining models are bootstrapped. (N) refers to normal, (P) to percentile, and (BC) to bias corrected confidence
intervals (1000 replications).
Public-PRIVATE Pay Differentials 313
More intriguing information
1. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence2. If our brains were simple, we would be too simple to understand them.
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. A Critical Examination of the Beliefs about Learning a Foreign Language at Primary School
6. The name is absent
7. Political Rents, Promotion Incentives, and Support for a Non-Democratic Regime
8. Regional specialisation in a transition country - Hungary
9. The name is absent
10. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH