Table 3. Pay gap between public and private sector: OLS results
Males |
β* = β pri |
Females |
β* = βpub | ||
β* = βpri |
β* = βpub | ||||
Predicted log wages |
ln Wpub = 2.2380 |
ln Wpri = 2.0239 |
ln Wpub = 2.1496 |
ln Wprri = 1.7358 | |
ln w pub - ln wpri |
0.2132 ** |
0.4140 ** | |||
(Xpub - Xpr )β |
0.2270 ** |
0.2215 ** |
0.1892 ** |
0.3802 ** | |
(106.0 %) |
(104.0 %) |
(46.0 %) |
(92.0 %) | ||
Xpr ( β* - βpr ) |
- |
-0.0082 |
- |
0.0338 | |
(-4.0%) |
(8.0 %) | ||||
χPub (βPu - β*) |
-0.0138 |
- |
0.2248 ** | ||
(-6.0 %) |
(54.0 %) |
- |
Note: Cross-section weights applied. *,**, and *** denote significance at 10%, 5% and 1% respectively. Standard errors in parentheses, where OLS standard
errors are robust and the s.e. for the remaining models are bootstrapped. (N) refers to normal, (P) to percentile, and (BC) to bias corrected confidence
intervals (1000 replications).
Public-PRIVATE Pay Differentials 313
More intriguing information
1. Bidding for Envy-Freeness: A Procedural Approach to n-Player Fair Division Problems2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Two-Part Tax Controls for Forest Density and Rotation Time
5. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
6. Whatever happened to competition in space agency procurement? The case of NASA
7. Evolving robust and specialized car racing skills
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Modelling the health related benefits of environmental policies - a CGE analysis for the eu countries with gem-e3