Behavioural Characteristics and Financial Distress



Table 7: Probit Results OfFinancial Distress (Dependent Variable: ‘Struggle to Keep Up’)

__________Pooled

Sample____

Irish Sample

____UK Sample____

(1)

(2)

(3)

(4)

(5)

(6)

Marginal

Std.

Marginal

Std.

Marginal

Std.

Marginal

Std.

Marginal

Std.

Marginal

Std.

Impact

Error

Impact

Error

Impact

Error

Impact

Error

Impact

Error

Impact_____

Error

Male

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.01

0.00

0.01

-0.02

0.03

0.00

0.01

Age

0.02***

0.00

0.02***

0.00

0.02***

0.00

0.02***

0.00

0.01***

0.01

0.02***

0.00

Age sq. 2

-0.02***

0.00

-0.02***

0.00

-0.02***

0.00

-0.02***

0.00

-0.02***

0.00

-0.02***

0.00

Married 2

-0.06***

0.02

-0.05***

0.02

-0.05***

0.02

-0.05**

0.02

-0.02

0.04

-0.05***

0.02

W∕D∕S 2

0.06***

0.02

0.07***

0.02

0.07***

0.02

0.07***

0.02

0.18***

0.05

0.04*

0.03

1 Child 2

0.08***

0.02

0.08***

0.02

0.08***

0.02

0.09***

0.02

0.07

0.05

0.09***

0.02

2 Children 2

Q ɪɪ***

0.02

Q ɪɪ***

0.02

Q ɪɪ***

0.02

Q ɪɪ***

0.02

0.11**

0.05

Q ɪɪ***

0.02

3+ Children 2

0.15***

0.03

0.15***

0.03

0.15***

0.03

0.15***

0.03

0.08

0.06

Qιγ***

0.04

UK

-0.03**

0.02

-0.03*

0.02

-0.03**

0.02

-0.03*

0.02

Employed 2

-0.18***

0.03

-0 17***

0.03

-0.18***

0.03

-0 17***

0.03

-0.25***

0.06

-0.13***

0.03

Retired 2

-0.14***

0.03

-0.13***

0.03

-0.13***

0.03

-0.12***

0.03

-0.15**

0.07

-0.09***

0.04

Inactive 2

-0.06**

0.03

-0.05*

0.03

-0.05*

0.03

-0.04

0.03

-0.13**

0.06

-0.01

0.03

College

-0.09***

0.02

-0.09***

0.02

-0.08***

0.02

-0.07***

0.02

-0.06*

0.03

-0.07***

0.02

Log Income

-0.05***

0.01

-0.05***

0.01

-0.05***

0.01

-0.04***

0.01

-0.06***

0.02

-0.03***

0.01

Debt

0.12***

0.01

Q ɪɪ***

0.01

Q ɪɪ***

0.01

Q ɪɪ***

0.01

0.13***

0.03

0.12***

0.02

Impulsive

Q ιγ***

0.02

0.16***

0.02

0.13***

0.02

0.13***

0.03

QJ4***

0.02

Organised

-0.07***

0.01

-0.06***

0.01

-0.07**

0.03

-0.06***

0.01

Live Today

0.10***

0.01

0.06**

0.03

0.10***

0.02

Literate: 42

0.00

0.03

Literate: 52

-0.08***

0.02

Literate: 62

-0.09***

0.02

N

6,518

6,510

6,501

6,484

1,413

5,043

LR chi2

892.46

1014.56

1046.30

1100.70

228.13

904.68

Prob chi2

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

0.0000

Pseudo R2

0.1035

0.1179

0.1217

0.1284

0.1211

0.1359

Notes: 1 Marginal Impact for Age sq. is scaled up by 100; 2 Omitted categories for dummy variables are: ‘Single’,‘No Children’, ‘Unemployed’ and
‘3 or less financial literacy questions answered correctly’.

*** Significant at 1% level; ** Significant at 5% level; * Significant at 10% level.

Note that the log-likelihood and pseudo-/?2 in columns 5 and 6 are not comparable with the previous columns in this table.



More intriguing information

1. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY
2. THE CHANGING RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN FEDERAL, STATE AND LOCAL GOVERNMENTS
3. The name is absent
4. Competition In or For the Field: Which is Better
5. Types of Tax Concessions for Promoting Investment in Free Economic and Trade Areas
6. The Role of Land Retirement Programs for Management of Water Resources
7. Business Networks and Performance: A Spatial Approach
8. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
9. Apprenticeships in the UK: from the industrial-relation via market-led and social inclusion models
10. Social Balance Theory
11. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
12. The name is absent
13. The name is absent
14. Income Mobility of Owners of Small Businesses when Boundaries between Occupations are Vague
15. The Advantage of Cooperatives under Asymmetric Cost Information
16. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
17. Magnetic Resonance Imaging in patients with ICDs and Pacemakers
18. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure
19. Improving the Impact of Market Reform on Agricultural Productivity in Africa: How Institutional Design Makes a Difference
20. Does Competition Increase Economic Efficiency in Swedish County Councils?