An n-simplex σ is called a completely labeled simplex if ∣Z(σ)∣ = n⅛ 1. Specifically,
an n-simplex σ is called a completely labeled simplex of type I if L(σ) = { 0 } U N_i
for an index i ∈ N. Whereas an n-simplex σ is called a completely labeled simplex
of type II if L(σ) = N. Observe that a completely labeled simplex of type I has a
vertex being an integral point in P.
Now we state our basic results.
Theorem 2.1 The Labeling Rule results in at least one completely labeled sim-
plex.
Proof: It can be derived by induction. We omit the details. □
Furthermore, one can derive the following sharper and more important results.
Theorem 2.2 If P does not contain any integral point, then the Labeling Rule
results in a unique completely labeled simplex.
Clearly, the unique completely labeled simplex must be of type II. A proof of the
above theorem is deferred to Section 4. This theorem can be seen as a generalization
of the following lemma (see van der Laan [4] and Talman [14] ).
Lemma 2.3 Choose an arbitrary point c ∈ Rn. We assign x ∈ Zn with the label
/(æ) = i if i is the smallest index for which
xi ~ ci = max{ Xj — cj I Xj — cj > 0, j ∈ ʌ }.
If Xi ≤ Ci for all i = 1, ■ ■ -, n, we assign x with the label /(æ) = n ⅛ 1. Then there
exists a unique completely labeled simplex.
Theorem 2.4 If P has an integral point, then the Labeling Rule results in at
least two completely labeled simplices. Moreover, there exists at most one completely
labeled simplex of type II.
More intriguing information
1. CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE ROLE OF ACCOUNTING AS INFORMATIONAL SYSTEM AND ASSISTANCE OF DECISION2. Personal Experience: A Most Vicious and Limited Circle!? On the Role of Entrepreneurial Experience for Firm Survival
3. Markets for Influence
4. The name is absent
5. Partner Selection Criteria in Strategic Alliances When to Ally with Weak Partners
6. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
7. The name is absent
8. Backpropagation Artificial Neural Network To Detect Hyperthermic Seizures In Rats
9. Regionale Wachstumseffekte der GRW-Förderung? Eine räumlich-ökonometrische Analyse auf Basis deutscher Arbeitsmarktregionen
10. HACCP AND MEAT AND POULTRY INSPECTION