The name is absent



An n-simplex σ is called a completely labeled simplex if ∣Z(σ)∣ = n⅛ 1. Specifically,
an n-simplex
σ is called a completely labeled simplex of type I if L(σ) = { 0 } U N_i
for an index i N. Whereas an n-simplex σ is called a completely labeled simplex
of type
II if L(σ) = N. Observe that a completely labeled simplex of type I has a
vertex being an integral point in
P.

Now we state our basic results.

Theorem 2.1 The Labeling Rule results in at least one completely labeled sim-
plex.

Proof: It can be derived by induction. We omit the details.                   □

Furthermore, one can derive the following sharper and more important results.

Theorem 2.2 If P does not contain any integral point, then the Labeling Rule
results in a unique completely labeled simplex.

Clearly, the unique completely labeled simplex must be of type II. A proof of the
above theorem is deferred to Section 4. This theorem can be seen as a generalization
of the following lemma (see van der Laan [4] and Talman [14] ).

Lemma 2.3 Choose an arbitrary point c Rn. We assign x Zn with the label
/(æ) = i if i is the smallest index for which

xi ~ ci = max{ Xj — cj I Xj — cj > 0, j ʌ }.

If Xi ≤ Ci for all i = 1, -, n, we assign x with the label /(æ) = n ⅛ 1. Then there
exists a unique completely labeled simplex.

Theorem 2.4 If P has an integral point, then the Labeling Rule results in at
least two completely labeled simplices. Moreover, there exists at most one completely
labeled simplex of type II.



More intriguing information

1. The Impact of Hosting a Major Sport Event on the South African Economy
2. The name is absent
3. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
4. Towards a framework for critical citizenship education
5. The name is absent
6. Job quality and labour market performance
7. The name is absent
8. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
9. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach
10. Three Policies to Improve Productivity Growth in Canada