zjt≤1-mj,t-1 j=1,...,M, t=1,...,T (2)
zjt≤mjt j=1,...,M, t=1,...,T (3)
zjt≥(1-mj,t-1)+mjt-1 j=1,...,M, t=1,...,T (4)
The constraint sets (2), (3) and (4) also fix zjt at either 0 or 1.
To make sure that no jobs can be planned during a preventive maintenance (which requires RT
periods of time) we need the next constraints to make mjk one for every
k=t,...,t+RT-1:
zjt ≤ mjk j= 1,...,M, t= 1,...,T, k = t,...,t+RT-1 (5)
Besides constraints (1) through (5), some other key constraints are needed. A fundamental
material balance equation for each period is stated as:
Production + beginning inventory - ending inventory = demand
Or mathematically:
∑M Rijδijt+(I+i,t-1-Ii-,t-1)-(I+it-Ii-t)=Dit i=1,...,N t=1,...,T(6)
j=1
where inventory is defined as Iit+ - Iit- , or positive net inventory minus backorders.
Rij is defined as the capacity of production line j divided by the processing time of product i on
production line j, or: Rij= Capj / pij.
Maintenance and production cannot be scheduled in the same period on a certain production line.
Constraint (7) prevents this from happening:
∑N δijt+mjt≤1 j=1,...,M t = 0,...,T (7)
i=1
The variable yjmt must equal one when the last preventive maintenance job on production line j
occurred in period m and we are now in period t. To ensure this, we define yjmt as:
yjmt = (1-mjt)(1-mj,t-1)...(1-mj,m+1 )mjm
This is again nonlinear, so we use the same technique as applied in constraints (2) through (4):
yjmt≤1-mjk j=1,..., M, t=1,...,T, k=m+1,...,t (8)
yjmt≤mjm j=1,..., M, t=1,...,T, m=0,...,t-1 (9)
t
yjmt≥ ∑ (1-mjk)+mjm-(t-m) j=1,..., M, t=1,...,T, m=0,...,t-1 (10)
k=m+1
where yjmt is greater than or equal to 0.
To initialize some of the variables, we introduce a dummy period 0, where the previous
preventive maintenance was performed and where inventory was zero.
mj,0 = 1 j= 1,..., M
(11)
2
The general rule for linearizing expressions like x1...xk is as follows: replace x1...xk with y and add the next three constraints:
1) y<_ xj, 1_< j<_ k
2) y>_ Σkj=1 xj - (k-1)
3) y>_ 0
More intriguing information
1. Can genetic algorithms explain experimental anomalies? An application to common property resources2. The name is absent
3. Midwest prospects and the new economy
4. The name is absent
5. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
6. The name is absent
7. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
8. The name is absent
9. Language discrimination by human newborns and by cotton-top tamarin monkeys
10. Linkages between research, scholarship and teaching in universities in China