11
th that8)
∣ ,. [(1 β)2 + χ]3u2 г l./ ∖ (1 β)2uu2 and
F(0) = jʌ___—__—__, lim F(ε) = 2___an__ and
σ⅛1 -β )4 i σj
(1 -β)2u2 < F(ε) < [(1 -β)2÷χ]3u2
σ2 σ2μ(1 -β )4
We are now ready to prove:
PROPOSITION 3.2: (1 ~β)2u2 < ɛ* < [(1 ~β)2 + χ]3u2
σ2 σ2μ(1 -β )4
Proof: The left-hand side of (3.8) is a 45-degree straight line through the origin. Since
F(0) = [(1 β) + χ] u and dF < 0, these two functions must intersect at one and only
σ2μ(1 -β )4 əɛ
one point. Moreover, since
u (1 ~β) < F(ε) < [(1 ~β) +χ] u , the intersection occurs at a
σ2μ σ22(1 -β )4
value of ɛ that is bounded between (1 β ) u and [(1 β) +χ] u
σ2 σμ(1 -β )4
Figure 3.1 illustrates the argument graphically. Clearly, a solution for ɛ exists and is
unique.
8) These statements are demonstrated in Appendix B to this paper.
More intriguing information
1. Evaluating the Success of the School Commodity Food Program2. Fortschritte bei der Exportorientierung von Dienstleistungsunternehmen
3. Large-N and Large-T Properties of Panel Data Estimators and the Hausman Test
4. The name is absent
5. IMMIGRATION AND AGRICULTURAL LABOR POLICIES
6. The name is absent
7. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
8. The name is absent
9. On the Integration of Digital Technologies into Mathematics Classrooms
10. The name is absent