21
Table 4.1. Table based on estimation with all restrictions.
Sample period 1960 - 1993 for all variables (except for NAIRU: 1960 - 1988).
OPCBI = -0.098 * NAIRU M + 0.038 * WLEFT M - 0.039 * VPROD M + 2.025 * SLOPE M
(-1.296) (0.054) (-0.638) (2.008)
Note: _M means that variables are taken in deviation form their mean.
Т-values in parentheses.
|
Country |
Indices |
ES |
LVAU |
Transformed Indices |
OPCBI |
OPCBI N |
Differences (INDEX-OPCBI) | |||||||
|
AL |
GMTT |
AL_N |
GMTTN |
ES-N |
AL-N |
GMTTN |
ES-N |
LVAU |
AvDIFF | |||||
|
Australia |
1 |
9 |
1 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
0.56 |
0.00 |
-0.026 |
0.415 |
-0.42 |
0.15 |
-0.42 |
-0.11 |
-0.20 |
|
Austria |
9 |
3 |
0.58 |
0.56 |
0.50 |
0.158 |
0.460 |
0.10 |
0.04 |
0.12 |
0.09 | |||
|
Belgium |
2 |
7 |
3 |
0.19 |
0.33 |
0.44 |
0.50 |
-0.08 |
0.401 |
-0.07 |
0.04 |
0.10 |
-0.21 |
-0.04 |
|
Canada |
2 |
11 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.33 |
0.69 |
0.00 |
-0.160 |
0.381 |
-0.05 |
0.31 |
-0.38 |
0.08 |
-0.01 |
|
Denmark |
2 |
8 |
4 |
0.47 |
0.33 |
0.50 |
0.75 |
0.037 |
0.430 |
-0.10 |
0.07 |
0.32 |
0.04 |
0.08 |
|
Finland |
2 |
3 |
0.27 |
0.33 |
0.50 |
-0.141 |
0.386 |
-0.06 |
0.11 |
-0.12 |
-0.02 | |||
|
France |
2 |
7 |
2 |
0.28 |
0.33 |
0.44 |
0.25 |
-0.140 |
0.386 |
-0.06 |
0.05 |
-0.14 |
-0.11 |
-0.07 |
|
Germany |
4 |
13 |
5 |
0.66 |
1.00 |
0.81 |
1.00 |
0.246 |
0.482 |
0.52 |
0.33 |
0.52 |
0.18 |
0.39 |
|
Ireland |
7 |
0.39 |
0.44 |
-0.485 |
0.300 |
0.14 |
0.09 |
0.12 | ||||||
|
Italy |
1.5 |
5 |
2 |
0.22 |
0.17 |
0.31 |
0.25 |
-0.659 |
0.256 |
-0.09 |
0.05 |
-0.01 |
-0.04 |
-0.02 |
|
Japan |
3 |
6 |
3 |
0.16 |
0.67 |
0.38 |
0.50 |
-0.403 |
0.320 |
0.35 |
0.06 |
0.18 |
-0.16 |
0.11 |
|
Netherlands |
2 |
10 |
4 |
0.42 |
0.33 |
0.63 |
0.75 |
0.152 |
0.459 |
-0.13 |
0.17 |
0.29 |
-0.04 |
0.07 |
|
NewZealand |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0.27 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
0.50 |
-0.393 |
0.323 |
-0.32 |
-0.13 |
0.18 |
-0.05 |
-0.08 |
|
Norway |
2 |
2 |
0.14 |
0.33 |
0.25 |
0.281 |
0.491 |
-0.16 |
-0.24 |
-0.35 |
-0.25 | |||
|
Spain |
1 |
5 |
1 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
-1.213 |
0.118 |
-0.12 |
0.19 |
-0.12 |
0.09 |
0.01 |
|
Sweden |
2 |
2 |
0.27 |
0.33 |
0.25 |
1.072 |
0.689 |
-0.36 |
-0.44 |
-0.42 |
-0.41 | |||
|
Switzerland |
4 |
12 |
5 |
0.68 |
1.00 |
0.75 |
1.00 |
0.852 |
0.634 |
0.37 |
0.12 |
0.37 |
0.05 |
0.23 |
|
UK |
2 |
6 |
2 |
0.31 |
0.33 |
0.38 |
0.25 |
0.551 |
0.559 |
-0.23 |
-0.18 |
-0.31 |
-0.25 |
-0.24 |
|
US_______ |
3 |
12 |
3 |
0,51 |
0,67 |
0,75 |
0,50 |
0,632 |
0,579 |
0,09 |
0,17 |
-0,08 |
-0,07 |
0,03 |
More intriguing information
1. The Mathematical Components of Engineering2. The Employment Impact of Differences in Dmand and Production
3. Are combination forecasts of S&P 500 volatility statistically superior?
4. Ein pragmatisierter Kalkul des naturlichen Schlieβens nebst Metatheorie
5. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
6. Institutions, Social Norms, and Bargaining Power: An Analysis of Individual Leisure Time in Couple Households
7. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
8. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
9. What Drives the Productive Efficiency of a Firm?: The Importance of Industry, Location, R&D, and Size
10. he Effect of Phosphorylation on the Electron Capture Dissociation of Peptide Ions