23
Table 4.2. Table based on estimation without restrictions on the covariances of (γ2, γ3) and (γ2, ζ).
Sample period 1960 - 1993 for all variables (except for NAIRU: 1960 - 1988).
OPCBI = -0.008 * NAIRU M + 0.807 * WLEFT M - 0.436 * VPROD M + 0.923 * SLOPE M
(-0.237) (1.529) (-1.784) (1.452)
Note: _M means that variables are taken in deviation form their mean.
Т-values in parentheses.
|
Country |
Indices |
ES |
LVAU |
Transformed Indices |
OPCBI |
OPCBI N |
Differences (INDEX-OPCBI) | |||||||
|
AL |
GMTT |
AL_N |
GMTTN |
ES-N |
AL-N |
GMTTN |
ES-N |
LVAU |
AvDIFF | |||||
|
Australia |
1 |
9 |
1 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
0.56 |
0.00 |
0.461 |
0.536 |
-0.54 |
0.03 |
-0.54 |
-0.23 |
-0.32 |
|
Austria |
9 |
3 |
0.58 |
0.56 |
0.50 |
1.223 |
0.727 |
-0.16 |
-0.23 |
-0.15 |
-0.18 | |||
|
Belgium |
2 |
7 |
3 |
0.19 |
0.33 |
0.44 |
0.50 |
0.518 |
0.550 |
-0.22 |
-0.11 |
-0.05 |
-0.36 |
-0.19 |
|
Canada |
2 |
11 |
1 |
0.46 |
0.33 |
0.69 |
0.00 |
0.438 |
0.530 |
-0.20 |
0.16 |
-0.53 |
-0.07 |
-0.16 |
|
Denmark |
2 |
8 |
4 |
0.47 |
0.33 |
0.50 |
0.75 |
0.270 |
0.488 |
-0.16 |
0.01 |
0.26 |
-0.02 |
0.02 |
|
Finland |
2 |
3 |
0.27 |
0.33 |
0.50 |
0.625 |
0.577 |
-0.24 |
-0.08 |
-0.31 |
-0.21 | |||
|
France |
2 |
7 |
2 |
0.28 |
0.33 |
0.44 |
0.25 |
0.959 |
0.661 |
-0.33 |
-0.22 |
-0.41 |
-0.38 |
-0.34 |
|
Germany |
4 |
13 |
5 |
0.66 |
1.00 |
0.81 |
1.00 |
0.655 |
0.585 |
0.42 |
0.23 |
0.42 |
0.08 |
0.28 |
|
Ireland |
7 |
0.39 |
0.44 |
0.238 |
0.480 |
-0.04 |
-0.09 |
-0.07 | ||||||
|
Italy |
1.5 |
5 |
2 |
0.22 |
0.17 |
0.31 |
0.25 |
0.126 |
0.453 |
-0.29 |
-0.14 |
-0.20 |
-0.23 |
-0.22 |
|
Japan |
3 |
6 |
3 |
0.16 |
0.67 |
0.38 |
0.50 |
-3.410 |
0.000 |
0.67 |
0.38 |
0.50 |
0.16 |
0.43 |
|
Netherlands |
2 |
10 |
4 |
0.42 |
0.33 |
0.63 |
0.75 |
0.260 |
0.486 |
-0.15 |
0.14 |
0.26 |
-0.07 |
0.05 |
|
NewZealand |
1 |
3 |
3 |
0.27 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
0.50 |
-3.200 |
0.000 |
0.00 |
0.19 |
0.50 |
0.27 |
0.24 |
|
Norway |
2 |
2 |
0.14 |
0.33 |
0.25 |
1.579 |
0.816 |
-0.48 |
-0.57 |
-0.68 |
-0.57 | |||
|
Spain |
1 |
5 |
1 |
0.21 |
0.00 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
-1.925 |
0.000 |
0.00 |
0.31 |
0.00 |
0.21 |
0.13 |
|
Sweden |
2 |
2 |
0.27 |
0.33 |
0.25 |
1.915 |
0.900 |
-0.57 |
-0.65 |
-0.63 |
-0.62 | |||
|
Switzerland |
4 |
12 |
5 |
0.68 |
1.00 |
0.75 |
1.00 |
0.065 |
0.437 |
0.56 |
0.31 |
0.56 |
0.24 |
0.42 |
|
UK |
2 |
6 |
2 |
0.31 |
0.33 |
0.38 |
0.25 |
1.077 |
0.690 |
-0.36 |
-0.32 |
-0.44 |
-0.38 |
-0.37 |
|
US_______ |
3 |
12 |
3 |
0,51 |
0,67 |
0,75 |
0,50 |
0,741 |
0,606 |
0,06 |
0,14 |
-0,11 |
-0,10 |
0,00 |
More intriguing information
1. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?2. Altruism and fairness in a public pension system
3. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
4. EMU: some unanswered questions
5. Learning and Endogenous Business Cycles in a Standard Growth Model
6. Lumpy Investment, Sectoral Propagation, and Business Cycles
7. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent