CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI



Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi

gesting that transactions cost are imp ortant in contract participation.   The sign on this

coe¢cient implies that as the amount of transactions cost increases, contracting increases.
There may be some reason to believe that the number of hours used examining market
information is simultaneously determined with whether or not to contract.  However, one

may also argue that examination of market information may reveal the complexities and
di∏culties in marketing, thus leading those producers to deduce that transactions cost are
high and lead them to a greater use of contracting.

This hypothesized relationship may also be reflected through the attitudinal vari-
able EASE. In this case, producers who strongly disagreed that contracting was easier to do
than selling in spot markets were significantly less likely to participate in contracting. Con-
versely, those that agreed with the statement were significantly more likely to participate
in contracting.  This result suggests that perceptions about ease of contracting compared

to spot marketing, which can be construed as a transactions cost (opportunity cost on the
producer), significantly influences contracting decisions.   There is no clear reason for the

positive sign on the coe∏icienl for the PREF variable. On one hand, one might expect that
those respondents who prefer to concentrate on farming (strongly agree to the statement)
might simply contract the crop to simplify marketing decisions.  However, one might also

argue that those who prefer marketing are more inclined to spend significant time and money
searching out buyers and information, and would therefore be more likely to contract. Nei-
ther story is particularly compelling, but the results suggest that producers’ preferences for
farming
versus marketing significantly influences contracting decisions.

14



More intriguing information

1. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
2. Insecure Property Rights and Growth: The Roles of Appropriation Costs, Wealth Effects, and Heterogeneity
3. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
4. Solidaristic Wage Bargaining
5. The name is absent
6. Tax Increment Financing for Optimal Open Space Preservation: an Economic Inquiry
7. The name is absent
8. Integrating the Structural Auction Approach and Traditional Measures of Market Power
9. THE INTERNATIONAL OUTLOOK FOR U.S. TOBACCO
10. The name is absent
11. A THEORETICAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATING SOCIAL WELFARE EFFECTS OF NEW AGRICULTURAL TECHNOLOGY
12. The name is absent
13. Target Acquisition in Multiscale Electronic Worlds
14. Evidence-Based Professional Development of Science Teachers in Two Countries
15. Contribution of Economics to Design of Sustainable Cattle Breeding Programs in Eastern Africa: A Choice Experiment Approach
16. The Impact of Optimal Tariffs and Taxes on Agglomeration
17. The name is absent
18. Globalization, Redistribution, and the Composition of Public Education Expenditures
19. The name is absent
20. Momentum in Australian Stock Returns: An Update