CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI

Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi

6  References

Allen, D. and D. Lueck. “Risk Preferences and the Economics of Contracts.” American
Economic Review, 85(1985): 447-451.

Drabenstott, M. “Agricultural Industrialization: Implications for Economic Development
and Public Policy.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 27(1995): 13-20.

Gillespie, J. and V. Eidman. “The Effect of Risk and Autonomy on Independent Hog Pro-
ducers’ Contracting Decisions.” Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 30(1998):
175-188.

Goodhue, R., G. Rausser, and L. Simon. “Understanding Production Contracts: Testing
An Agency Theory Model.” Paper presented to the 1998 American Agricultural Economics
Association Annual Meeti ng, Salt Lake City, UT, August.

Hennessey, D. and J. Lawrence. “Contractual Relations, Control, and Quality in the Hog
Sector.” Review of Agricultural Economics, 21(1999): 52-67.

Hobbs, J. “Measuri ng the Importance of Transaction Costs in Cattle Marketing.” Amer-
ican Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(1997): 1083-1095.

Hueth, B., E. Ligon, S. Wolf, and S. Wu. “Incentive Instruments in Fruit and Vegetable
Contracts: Input Control, Monitoring, Measuring and Price Risk.” Review of Agricultural
Economics, 21(1999): 374-389.

Johnson, C. and K. Foster. “Risk Preferences and Contracting in the U.S. Hog Industry.”
Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, 26(1994): 393-405.

Joskow, P. “Contract Duration and Relationship-Specific Investments: Empirical Evi-

18

<<   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   >>

More intriguing information