Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi
Table 1. Use of Contracting by Agricultural Producers
|
Commodity % Value Under Contract | ||
|
1993 |
1998 | |
|
Corn |
12.3 |
13.1 |
|
Soybeans |
12.4 |
12.2 |
|
Wheat |
6.8 |
N/A |
|
Cotton |
32.7 |
50.6 |
|
Vegetablesa |
47.4 |
45.5 |
|
Fruits |
56.7 | |
|
Cattlea |
18.4 |
25.3 |
|
Hogs |
42.9 | |
|
Poultry |
89.4 |
94.9 |
a Vegetables and Fruits were reported together in 1993; Cattle and Hogs were reported
together in 1993.
Source: USDA and Perry and Banker.
21
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Labour Market Flexibility and Regional Unemployment Rate Dynamics: Spain (1980-1995)
4. The Shepherd Sinfonia
5. The name is absent
6. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
7. Evidence of coevolution in multi-objective evolutionary algorithms
8. The name is absent
9. Bargaining Power and Equilibrium Consumption
10. References