CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI



Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi

Table 1. Use of Contracting by Agricultural Producers

Commodity % Value Under Contract

1993

1998

Corn

12.3

13.1

Soybeans

12.4

12.2

Wheat

6.8

N/A

Cotton

32.7

50.6

Vegetablesa

47.4

45.5

Fruits

56.7

Cattlea

18.4

25.3

Hogs

42.9

Poultry

89.4

94.9

a Vegetables and Fruits were reported together in 1993; Cattle and Hogs were reported

together in 1993.

Source: USDA and Perry and Banker.

21



More intriguing information

1. Internationalization of Universities as Internationalization of Bildung
2. Computational Batik Motif Generation Innovation of Traditi onal Heritage by Fracta l Computation
3. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE
4. Analyse des verbraucherorientierten Qualitätsurteils mittels assoziativer Verfahren am Beispiel von Schweinefleisch und Kartoffeln
5. Testing Gribat´s Law Across Regions. Evidence from Spain.
6. What Lessons for Economic Development Can We Draw from the Champagne Fairs?
7. The name is absent
8. The Determinants of Individual Trade Policy Preferences: International Survey Evidence
9. Alzheimer’s Disease and Herpes Simplex Encephalitis
10. The Impact of EU Accession in Romania: An Analysis of Regional Development Policy Effects by a Multiregional I-O Model
11. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
12. SAEA EDITOR'S REPORT, FEBRUARY 1988
13. Modeling industrial location decisions in U.S. counties
14. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
15. Developing vocational practice in the jewelry sector through the incubation of a new ‘project-object’
16. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure
17. The name is absent
18. Neighborhood Effects, Public Housing and Unemployment in France
19. Auction Design without Commitment
20. The name is absent