Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi
Table 4. Means of Relevant Variable by Product Categories, Contracting Survey, Mississippi, 2001._______________________________________________________ | ||||||
Variable Unclassified |
Cotton |
Field Crops |
FNVO |
Livestock |
Other | |
CVP HOURS OFFINC ASSETSP CONTRACT1 CONTRACT2 |
20.92 0.85 60.17 37.65 0.07 0.00 |
14.98 2.55 42.82 38.96 0.56 0.26 |
18.51 1.25 49.11 38.62 0.21 0.18 |
27.22 1.03 59.69 36.42 0.09 0.03 |
20.39 1.05 52.14 43.18 0.07 0.06 |
19.31 0.82 61.27 49.54 0.12 0.04 |
No. Obs. |
43 |
27 |
33 |
32 |
105 |
25 |
CVP is the coe¢cient of variation in |
expected price for the primary product, Hours |
is the number of hours spent collecting and analyzing market information, OFFINC is the
percentage of total household income that is derived from off-farm sources, ASSETSP is the
percentage of total assets that can be used in the production of only one output, Contract1
is the proportion of respondents that utilized either forward contracts, marketing pools,
resource providing or production management contracts, and Contract2 is the proportion
of respondents that utilized either forward resource providing, or production management
contracts.
24
More intriguing information
1. FOREIGN AGRICULTURAL SERVICE PROGRAMS AND FOREIGN RELATIONS2. Palkkaneuvottelut ja työmarkkinat Pohjoismaissa ja Euroopassa
3. The name is absent
4. Pupils’ attitudes towards art teaching in primary school: an evaluation tool
5. Epistemology and conceptual resources for the development of learning technologies
6. DURABLE CONSUMPTION AS A STATUS GOOD: A STUDY OF NEOCLASSICAL CASES
7. Evaluation of the Development Potential of Russian Cities
8. Thresholds for Employment and Unemployment - a Spatial Analysis of German Regional Labour Markets 1992-2000
9. The growing importance of risk in financial regulation
10. Popular Conceptions of Nationhood in Old and New European