Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi
|
Table 4. Means of Relevant Variable by Product Categories, Contracting Survey, Mississippi, 2001._______________________________________________________ | ||||||
|
Variable Unclassified |
Cotton |
Field Crops |
FNVO |
Livestock |
Other | |
|
CVP HOURS OFFINC ASSETSP CONTRACT1 CONTRACT2 |
20.92 0.85 60.17 37.65 0.07 0.00 |
14.98 2.55 42.82 38.96 0.56 0.26 |
18.51 1.25 49.11 38.62 0.21 0.18 |
27.22 1.03 59.69 36.42 0.09 0.03 |
20.39 1.05 52.14 43.18 0.07 0.06 |
19.31 0.82 61.27 49.54 0.12 0.04 |
|
No. Obs. |
43 |
27 |
33 |
32 |
105 |
25 |
|
CVP is the coe¢cient of variation in |
expected price for the primary product, Hours | |||||
is the number of hours spent collecting and analyzing market information, OFFINC is the
percentage of total household income that is derived from off-farm sources, ASSETSP is the
percentage of total assets that can be used in the production of only one output, Contract1
is the proportion of respondents that utilized either forward contracts, marketing pools,
resource providing or production management contracts, and Contract2 is the proportion
of respondents that utilized either forward resource providing, or production management
contracts.
24
More intriguing information
1. 09-01 "Resources, Rules and International Political Economy: The Politics of Development in the WTO"2. On Dictatorship, Economic Development and Stability
3. The name is absent
4. The geography of collaborative knowledge production: entropy techniques and results for the European Union
5. The name is absent
6. Innovation Trajectories in Honduras’ Coffee Value Chain. Public and Private Influence on the Use of New Knowledge and Technology among Coffee Growers
7. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
8. The name is absent
9. TRADE NEGOTIATIONS AND THE FUTURE OF AMERICAN AGRICULTURE
10. Foreign direct investment in the Indian telecommunications sector