CROSS-COMMODITY PERSPECTIVE ON CONTRACTING: EVIDENCE FROM MISSISSIPPI



Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi

Table 6. Regression Results, Restricted Sample, Mississippi 2001.

Variable

Estimate

Standard Error

Â2 value

Intercept

-1.854

1.6656

1.2385

CVP

-0.030

0.0365

0.6867

HOURS

0.467

0.1904

6.0096**

PREF

0.707

0.2513

7.9176*

EASE

-0.681

0.2513

6.9115*

ASSETSP

0.021

0.0099

4.6386**

EDU

0.620

0.5452

1.2927

OFFINC

-0.016

0.0077

4.4550**

Age

-0.017

0.0208

0.6681

Log-likelihood Â2

39.624

No. Obs.

264

* Statistically significant at the 0.01 level.

** Statistically significant at the 0.05 level.

*** Statistically significant at the 0.10 level.

26



More intriguing information

1. Towards a Mirror System for the Development of Socially-Mediated Skills
2. Spatial agglomeration and business groups: new evidence from Italian industrial districts
3. The Interest Rate-Exchange Rate Link in the Mexican Float
4. The name is absent
5. Before and After the Hartz Reforms: The Performance of Active Labour Market Policy in Germany
6. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Learning-by-Exporting? Firm-Level Evidence for UK Manufacturing and Services Sectors
10. Regional science policy and the growth of knowledge megacentres in bioscience clusters
11. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
12. The name is absent
13. Macroeconomic Interdependence in a Two-Country DSGE Model under Diverging Interest-Rate Rules
14. Sustainability of economic development and governance patterns in water management - an overview on the reorganisation of public utilities in Campania, Italy, under EU Framework Directive in the field of water policy (2000/60/CE)
15. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
16. The name is absent
17. Optimal Taxation of Capital Income in Models with Endogenous Fertility
18. The name is absent
19. ROBUST CLASSIFICATION WITH CONTEXT-SENSITIVE FEATURES
20. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders