Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of Relevant Variables, Contracti ng Survey,
|
Mississippi, 2001._________________________ | ||
|
Variable |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
|
CVP |
20.41 |
9.08 |
|
Hours |
1.17 |
1.06 |
|
OFFINC |
53.89 |
36.36 |
|
ASSETSP |
41.06 |
25.74 |
|
Contract1 |
0.14 |
0.35 |
|
Contract2 |
0.08 |
0.27 |
|
CVP is the coellicienl of variation in expected price for the primary product, Hours is | ||
the number of hours spent collecting and analyzing market information, OFFINC is the
percentage of total household income that is derived from off-farm sources, ASSETSP is the
percentage of total assets that can be used in the production of only one output, Contract1
is the proportion of respondents that utilized either forward contracts, marketing pools,
resource providing or production management contracts, and Contract2 is the proportion
of respondents that utilized either forward resource providing, or production management
contracts.
23
More intriguing information
1. Midwest prospects and the new economy2. How does an infant acquire the ability of joint attention?: A Constructive Approach
3. PROFITABILITY OF ALFALFA HAY STORAGE USING PROBABILITIES: AN EXTENSION APPROACH
4. Benefits of travel time savings for freight transportation : beyond the costs
5. A Location Game On Disjoint Circles
6. The name is absent
7. Short Term Memory May Be the Depletion of the Readily Releasable Pool of Presynaptic Neurotransmitter Vesicles
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent