Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi
Table 3. Descriptive Statistics of Relevant Variables, Contracti ng Survey,
|
Mississippi, 2001._________________________ | ||
|
Variable |
Mean |
Standard Deviation |
|
CVP |
20.41 |
9.08 |
|
Hours |
1.17 |
1.06 |
|
OFFINC |
53.89 |
36.36 |
|
ASSETSP |
41.06 |
25.74 |
|
Contract1 |
0.14 |
0.35 |
|
Contract2 |
0.08 |
0.27 |
|
CVP is the coellicienl of variation in expected price for the primary product, Hours is | ||
the number of hours spent collecting and analyzing market information, OFFINC is the
percentage of total household income that is derived from off-farm sources, ASSETSP is the
percentage of total assets that can be used in the production of only one output, Contract1
is the proportion of respondents that utilized either forward contracts, marketing pools,
resource providing or production management contracts, and Contract2 is the proportion
of respondents that utilized either forward resource providing, or production management
contracts.
23
More intriguing information
1. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.2. DEVELOPING COLLABORATION IN RURAL POLICY: LESSONS FROM A STATE RURAL DEVELOPMENT COUNCIL
3. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
4. Determinants of U.S. Textile and Apparel Import Trade
5. NEW DEVELOPMENTS IN FARM PRICE AND INCOME POLICY PROGRAMS: PART I. SITUATION AND PROBLEM
6. Innovation and business performance - a provisional multi-regional analysis
7. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
8. Cancer-related electronic support groups as navigation-aids: Overcoming geographic barriers
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent