Cross-Commodity Perspective on Contracting: Evidenc e from Mississippi
Table 5. Regression Results, Full Sample, Mississippi, 2001.
Variable Estimate Standard Error Â2 value
|
Intercept |
-0.477 |
1.3105 |
0.1329 |
|
CVP |
-0.017 |
0.0259 |
0.4106 |
|
HOURS |
0.633 |
0.1585 |
15.9410* |
|
PREF |
0.585 |
0.2086 |
7.8505* |
|
EASE |
-0.494 |
0.2098 |
5.5518** |
|
ASSETSP |
0.012 |
0.0079 |
2.3057 |
|
EDU |
0.777 |
0.4306 |
3.2538*** |
|
OFFINC |
-0.006 |
0.0058 |
1.1584 |
|
AGE |
-0.043 |
0.0163 |
6.8594* |
|
Log-likelihood Â2 |
58.576 | ||
|
No. Obs. |
264 |
* Statistically significant at 0.01 level.
**Statistically significant at the 0.05 level.
***Statistically significant at the 0.10 level.
25
More intriguing information
1. Synchronisation and Differentiation: Two Stages of Coordinative Structure2. A production model and maintenance planning model for the process industry
3. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. Auction Design without Commitment
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent