partial derivative of F(∙) with respect to j = K, E, the Hamiltonian conditions are
|
∂H = |
,, , dm n |
(9) | ||
|
∂V |
O |
•■:> |
-e cυ + μ1 ∂v = o | |
|
∂H |
-∕11 = e~rt[F- - w] - μ1v |
(10) | ||
|
-μι = |
∂E |
•■:> | ||
|
E = |
∂H ⅜ι |
•■:> |
E = m(Û, V) - vE |
(11) |
|
∂H _ |
—e c + μ2 = O |
(12) | ||
|
~∂i = |
O |
•■:> | ||
|
∂H |
-μ2 = e-rt[F- - r] |
(13) | ||
|
-μ2 = |
∂K |
•■:> | ||
|
∂H |
(14) | |||
|
K = |
⅜2 |
•■:> |
K = I | |
|
with the transversality condition | ||||
Iim H(t) = O.
t→∞
The first order condition for capital respectively labor are given by
Fκ(k) = (1 + c1 ) r (15)
ʌ
Fe(k) = w + ʌ ccv r - λ + β (Û - V) + V θf3 (16)
1 — β L ∖ / _l
with F (k) [j = K, E] as marginal products and the right hand sides are marginal
costs of capital respectively labor.
After describing the intertemporal optimization problem of the representative
firm, the model has to be closed by denoting aggregate income and the budget
constraint. Factor income of the households Y is defined as the remuneration of
production factors capital and labor
Y := rK + wE
(17)
with the wage rate w.
The output is used for factor income Y, installation costs cjl and search costs
cvV :
X = Y + c1I + cvV.
(18)
Both of the last terms represent the profit income of firms that is completely used
for installation and search costs (1 — ω)Fε(k) = c√ + cυV.
17
More intriguing information
1. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?2. Constructing the Phylomemetic Tree Case of Study: Indonesian Tradition-Inspired Buildings
3. The name is absent
4. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
5. Non-causality in Bivariate Binary Panel Data
6. Reform of the EU Sugar Regime: Impacts on Sugar Production in Ireland
7. ANTI-COMPETITIVE FINANCIAL CONTRACTING: THE DESIGN OF FINANCIAL CLAIMS.
8. Declining Discount Rates: Evidence from the UK
9. Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index
10. The name is absent