Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics



Introduction

On this twentieth anniversary of Rob Engle’s seminal paper on ARCH it is
worth reflecting on some of the outstanding questions in the literature. It has
long been conjectured that stock market volatility exhibit occasional breaks.
Diebold (1986), Hendry (1986) and Lamoureux and Lastrapes (1990) were
among the first to suggest that persistence in volatility may be overstated
with the presence of structural breaks. More recent and related evidence is
provided by Diebold and Inoue (2001), Granger and Hyung (1999), Mikosch
and Starica (1999), among others, which shows that the presence of breaks
may also explain the findings of long memory, particularly in volatility.

There is a substantial literature on testing for the presence of breaks in
linearly dependent stochastic processes (see for instance Bai (1994, 1997),
Bai and Perron (1998) interalia). There is a temptation to apply the tests
for ARMA-type processes in the context of ARCH or Stochastic Volatil-
ity (SV) models. For instance, one could view squared returns as an ARMA
process and proceed with the application of tests suggested for testing breaks
in the mean. Unfortunately, things are not so simple. The resemblance be-
tween ARMA and GARCH or discrete time SV models is deceiving (see e.g.
Francq and Zakoian (2000a,b)). It took many years of research after the orig-
inal work of Engle (1982) to clarify the asymptotics of GARCH(I5I) processes
(see, for instance, Lee and Hansen (1984) and Lumsdaine (1996)) and the
asymptotics of more general univariate and multivariate GARCH processes
(see Ling and McAleer (2002 a,b)). Recently, Carrasco and Chen (2001)
present a comprehensive study which shows that most univariate GARCH
processes are /!-mixing. This result precludes the application of many afore-
mentioned tests for structural breaks that require a much stronger mixing
condition.1

The purpose of this paper is to explore recent advances in the theory of
change-point estimation for strongly dependent processes including ARCH
and SV models. Some early attempts to test for a break in a GARCH are
found in Chu (1995) and Lundberg and Terasvirta (1998). A number of
recent papers have shown the consistency of CUSUM type change-point es-
timators for a single break and least squares tests for multiple breaks. The
tests are not model-specific and apply to a large class of (strongly) depen-

1 Most tests proposed for linear processes impose (/-mixing or strong mixing conditions
which are not satisfied by ARCH processes. For a general treatment of estimating the
weak GARCH models, see Francq and Zakoian (2000b).



More intriguing information

1. Novelty and Reinforcement Learning in the Value System of Developmental Robots
2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. A Duality Approach to Testing the Economic Behaviour of Dairy-Marketing Co-operatives: The Case of Ireland
5. A Rare Presentation of Crohn's Disease
6. PER UNIT COSTS TO OWN AND OPERATE FARM MACHINERY
7. The name is absent
8. The name is absent
9. Making International Human Rights Protection More Effective: A Rational-Choice Approach to the Effectiveness of Ius Standi Provisions
10. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
11. The Role of Evidence in Establishing Trust in Repositories
12. The name is absent
13. The Role of area-yield crop insurance program face to the Mid-term Review of Common Agricultural Policy
14. The constitution and evolution of the stars
15. Changing spatial planning systems and the role of the regional government level; Comparing the Netherlands, Flanders and England
16. Revisiting The Bell Curve Debate Regarding the Effects of Cognitive Ability on Wages
17. Tourism in Rural Areas and Regional Development Planning
18. Public Debt Management in Brazil
19. The name is absent
20. The name is absent