Human Resource Management Practices and Wage Dispersion in U.S. Establishments



Abstract

This paper explores the relationship between the presence of employee involvement workplace prac-
tices and wage dispersion within firms. Using the representative sample of US establishments from the
National Employer Survey conducted in 1994 and 1997, the paper explores the links between employee
involvement workplace practices adoption and intensity of use (measured by the percentage of a firm’s
workers who operate under a given practice) and wage inequality within companies using OLS as well
as quantile regressions.

The results suggest that adoption of employee involvement workplace practices is associated with
greater wage dispersion. Compared to establishments not using any of the involvement practices, firms
that adopt a partial system or full system of practices, including regular problem-solving meetings
and/or self-managed team and/or job rotation, have significantly greater wage dispersion. On the
other hand, firms that complement the practices with training for production workers (on teamwork or
problem-solving meetings) have lower dispersion than those who do not complement with training. The
results based on employee involvement intensity of use show evidence of compression effects associated
with self-managed teamwork in the manufacturing sector at the 25th percentile or for low wage dispersion
firms. There is also evidence of wage compression effects associated with problem-solving meetings in
the non manufacturing sector for high wage dispersion firms.



More intriguing information

1. Confusion and Reinforcement Learning in Experimental Public Goods Games
2. The name is absent
3. Automatic Dream Sentiment Analysis
4. The magnitude and Cyclical Behavior of Financial Market Frictions
5. Putting Globalization and Concentration in the Agri-food Sector into Context
6. The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention
7. Gender and aquaculture: sharing the benefits equitably
8. Three Strikes and You.re Out: Reply to Cooper and Willis
9. SOCIOECONOMIC TRENDS CHANGING RURAL AMERICA
10. The name is absent
11. The name is absent
12. Growth and Technological Leadership in US Industries: A Spatial Econometric Analysis at the State Level, 1963-1997
13. The InnoRegio-program: a new way to promote regional innovation networks - empirical results of the complementary research -
14. Text of a letter
15. Benchmarking Regional Innovation: A Comparison of Bavaria, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland
16. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
17. Elicited bid functions in (a)symmetric first-price auctions
18. For Whom is MAI? A theoretical Perspective on Multilateral Agreements on Investments
19. Fiscal Policy Rules in Practice
20. Pursuit of Competitive Advantages for Entrepreneurship: Development of Enterprise as a Learning Organization. International and Russian Experience