The name is absent



1984. The panel used in this paper spans the years 1985 to 1996 because information on
workers mobility is not available in 1984. Since the period covers the German reunification, I
have excluded data on the former East German population to keep the pre and post unification
samples comparable.

The GSOEP is unique for the analysis hereafter because it provides information on move-
ments between and within firms through a question about changes in the worker’s employment
situation in the previous year. Most importantly, there is detailed information on the rank
occupied by the worker within his current occupation. These two pieces of information are
central to the study of wage and mobility dynamics within the firm. Another advantage is
that information is collected over a large sample of individuals and therefore, the analysis of
wage dynamics and intra-firm mobility can be done for a large sample firms (although survey
data do not provide as many details about firm characteristics as for individuals).

3.1 Variable and Data Selection

The GSOEP provides information on individual characteristics such as age, education, sex,
marital status, nationality and employment status. Wages are given on a monthly basis,
corresponding to the month preceding the time of the survey.
13

Firm characteristics include the type of industry, whether the firm belongs to the public
sector, firm size and the duration of the employment contract (unlimited or limited length).
Information about unionization is not available on a longitudinal basis as the question is asked
only twice over the sample period (1989 and 1993). Although I cannot control for the presence
of unions, the variable indicating whether individuals work in a public or private sector firm
should partially pick up differences in wage policies between unionized and non unionized
firms. Moreover, given that unions have a predominant impact in the German economy at
the industry and national level, controlling for treatment differences for unionized and non-
unionized workers across firms is not as critical as it would be in an economy where both play
a significantly different role at the firm level.

I have selected individuals aged between 20 and 65 who are working at the time of the
survey on a full-time basis. I have excluded self-employed workers and put a restriction on
wages excluding any observations below 500 DM per month.
14 The resulting sample contains

13 I used wages after deductions for tax and social security because it is the earning variable most frequently
reported.

14 Since in Germany, the minimum wage varies by industry, this bound should give a reasonable minimum in

13



More intriguing information

1. BUSINESS SUCCESS: WHAT FACTORS REALLY MATTER?
2. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS
3. Lending to Agribusinesses in Zambia
4. Modellgestützte Politikberatung im Naturschutz: Zur „optimalen“ Flächennutzung in der Agrarlandschaft des Biosphärenreservates „Mittlere Elbe“
5. The name is absent
6. Gerontocracy in Motion? – European Cross-Country Evidence on the Labor Market Consequences of Population Ageing
7. Return Predictability and Stock Market Crashes in a Simple Rational Expectations Model
8. Flatliners: Ideology and Rational Learning in the Diffusion of the Flat Tax
9. Telecommuting and environmental policy - lessons from the Ecommute program
10. Eigentumsrechtliche Dezentralisierung und institutioneller Wettbewerb
11. The name is absent
12. Fiscal Insurance and Debt Management in OECD Economies
13. Population ageing, taxation, pensions and health costs, CHERE Working Paper 2007/10
14. The name is absent
15. La mobilité de la main-d'œuvre en Europe : le rôle des caractéristiques individuelles et de l'hétérogénéité entre pays
16. Delivering job search services in rural labour markets: the role of ICT
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. Restricted Export Flexibility and Risk Management with Options and Futures
20. APPLICATIONS OF DUALITY THEORY TO AGRICULTURE