Figure 5: Correlogram of Squared Residuals, Daily Average Temperature
.15∙
,10.
.05∙
.00∙
-.05∙
-.10∙
-.15∙
Atlanta
C hicag o
Philade Ip hia
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 8 0
'15^Γ
.10-
-.10-
15 j-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
Las Vegas
.15.
.10-
.05-
.00-
-.05-
'√V
-.10-
-.15 -------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------1-------------
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 8 0
Figure 6: Estimated Conditional Standard Deviations, Daily Average Temperature
10-
2.
Atlanta
9-
8-
7-
6-
5-
4-
3-
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Las Vegas
Philadelphia
10
10-
9-
9
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Figure 7: Forecast Skill Relative to Persistence Forecast, Daily Average Temperature Point Forecasts
1.1-
0.3-τ
Chicago
1.0-
0.9-
0.8-
0.7-
0.6-
0.5-
0.4-
12345678 9 10 11
Figure 8: Forecast Skill Relative to Climatological Forecast, Daily Average Temperature
Atlanta
Chicag o
Las Vegas
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. The name is absent
3. Effects of a Sport Education Intervention on Students’ Motivational Responses in Physical Education
4. Regional dynamics in mountain areas and the need for integrated policies
5. The Mathematical Components of Engineering
6. The name is absent
7. Der Einfluß der Direktdemokratie auf die Sozialpolitik
8. Innovation Policy and the Economy, Volume 11
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent