3. Convergence in distribution of a class of random matrices and their
generalized eigenvalues
Our tests will be based on the following pair of random matrices:
m
 = Va χιTk,
m n, k n, k,
k= 1
m
Bn, ≈ Σ bn, fink ■
k= 1
depending on a natural number m ≥ q, where
m;(F„(•))/fin b = fin M(F1(•))
an, k .-------------------------------------------------------- , n, k .---------------------
y ʃʃFk(x )Fk (y )min(x, y ) dxdy y ʃFk(x )2 dx
with
nn
M(Fk) = fi∑F((t/n)z,, Mfiz(F.) - ɪ Fk( t/n )ʌzt •
t= 1 t= 1
where {Fk } is a class of differentiable real functions on the unit interval [0,1]. As will be
shown below, the functions Fk can be chosen such that
( ʌ
D . .,,ɔ m _ . .,,ɔ
→ C (1) C (1) T £ XkXkτ C (1) C (1) T) ,
(5)
→C(1) C(1) 1/2 ∑ Y1Y1T C(1) C(1) T) 1/2,
yk= 1
where the Xk ’s and Yk ’s are independent q-variate standard normal random vectors, and →D
indicates convergence in distribution. In order to apply the result of Andersen, Brons and
Jensen (1983), saying:
if for a pair of square random matrices Pn , Qn ,(Pn,Qn ) converges in distribution to
(P,Q), where Q is a.s. nonsingular, then the ordered solutions of the generalized
eigenvalue problem det(Pn -λQn ) = 0 converge in distribution to the ordered solutions of
More intriguing information
1. SME'S SUPPORT AND REGIONAL POLICY IN EU - THE NORTE-LITORAL PORTUGUESE EXPERIENCE2. Private tutoring at transition points in the English education system: its nature, extent and purpose
3. Convergence in TFP among Italian Regions - Panel Unit Roots with Heterogeneity and Cross Sectional Dependence
4. TINKERING WITH VALUATION ESTIMATES: IS THERE A FUTURE FOR WILLINGNESS TO ACCEPT MEASURES?
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. Labour Market Institutions and the Personal Distribution of Income in the OECD
8. European Integration: Some stylised facts
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent