Higher education funding reforms in England: the distributional effects and the shifting balance of costs



the removal of upfront fees, which reduces student reliance on external sources of
funding such as bank loans. In this section we will analyse each of these three aspects.

Note however, that in making comparisons across the two HE funding systems it is
important to emphasise that our analysis here is
partial: it focuses on the impact on
graduates of the debt repayment element of these systems, but ignores how much
graduates as taxpayers would have been expected to pay, in tax, to raise the required
government revenue to finance these systems. We will return to this in Section 5.

Figure through Figure set out the differences between the old and new systems along
the above three dimensions. Each figure presents the distributional pattern of graduate
debt repayments under the new system as compared to the system being replaced. Due
to the substantial differences across males and females that are masked by considering
the whole graduate population together, as seen in the previous section, from hereon
we show all analyses separately by gender.

First we show the effects of the two new changes to the loan repayment conditions -
the provision for debt write-off after 25 years and the raising of the repayment
threshold to £15,000. By comparing the two systems for a given level of debt (here
fixed at the new system’s maximum level of £18,340),
Figure shows that this
combination of reforms is progressive across the distribution of graduate earnings - it
reduces the amount that all graduates will have to repay, but reduces the amount for
the lowest earning graduates the most. The biggest gains clearly arise for
approximately the poorest fifth of women, who repay an average of around £3,600
less under the new system. These are the women who as we illustrated earlier, gain
from debt write-off after 25 years.

Figure . Distributional effects of new system compared to old system of HE
funding: effects of reforms to loan system (raising of threshold to £15,000 and
introduction of debt write-off after 25 years)

19



More intriguing information

1. The name is absent
2. Why unwinding preferences is not the same as liberalisation: the case of sugar
3. AMINO ACIDS SEQUENCE ANALYSIS ON COLLAGEN
4. A Note on Productivity Change in European Co-operative Banks: The Luenberger Indicator Approach
5. The name is absent
6. Rent-Seeking in Noxious Weed Regulations: Evidence from US States
7. Les freins culturels à l'adoption des IFRS en Europe : une analyse du cas français
8. Exchange Rate Uncertainty and Trade Growth - A Comparison of Linear and Nonlinear (Forecasting) Models
9. The name is absent
10. Measuring and Testing Advertising-Induced Rotation in the Demand Curve
11. Correlates of Alcoholic Blackout Experience
12. Name Strategy: Its Existence and Implications
13. AGRICULTURAL TRADE LIBERALIZATION UNDER NAFTA: REPORTING ON THE REPORT CARD
14. CAN CREDIT DEFAULT SWAPS PREDICT FINANCIAL CRISES? EMPIRICAL STUDY ON EMERGING MARKETS
15. Strengthening civil society from the outside? Donor driven consultation and participation processes in Poverty Reduction Strategies (PRSP): the Bolivian case
16. Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies
17. Work Rich, Time Poor? Time-Use of Women and Men in Ireland
18. The name is absent
19. The Making of Cultural Policy: A European Perspective
20. Expectations, money, and the forecasting of inflation