Table 3. Logging and Wood Products Sectors--Percent Change for Selected Variables for Alternative Forest Service (FS) Harvest Levels Relative to
Baseline Harvest Level
Micro Affects: Short Run Scenario
Industry |
Variable |
Base |
0.9*FS |
0.8*FS |
0.7*FS |
0.6*FS |
0.5*FS |
0.4*FS |
0.3*FS |
0.2*FS |
0.1*FS |
0.0*FS |
LOGGING |
X |
0.00% |
1.66% |
2.24% |
2.07% |
1.26% |
-0.17% |
-2.27% |
-5.12% |
-8.85% |
-13.73% |
-20.20% |
XD |
0.00% |
-2.23% |
-5.72% |
-10.04% |
-15.06% |
-20.67% |
-26.87% |
-33.66% |
-41.10% |
-49.27% |
-58.33% | |
XXD |
0.00% |
26.49% |
47.49% |
64.61% |
78.43% |
89.06% |
96.44% |
100.37% |
100.21% |
95.13% |
83.61% | |
Q |
0.00% |
-1.32% |
-3.59% |
-6.46% |
-9.81% |
-13.55% |
-17.65% |
-22.13% |
-27.01% |
-32.37% |
-38.41% | |
PX |
0.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
2.00% |
2.00% |
3.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
4.00% |
5.00% | |
PD |
0.00% |
1.00% |
3.00% |
6.00% |
8.00% |
11.00% |
15.00% |
19.00% |
23.00% |
29.00% |
36.00% | |
PDD |
0.00% |
5.00% |
9.00% |
12.00% |
15.00% |
17.00% |
19.00% |
21.00% |
22.00% |
23.00% |
24.00% | |
E |
0.00% |
-1.85% |
-4.26% |
-7.06% |
-10.15% |
-13.52% |
-17.18% |
-21.17% |
-25.56% |
-30.49% |
-36.23% | |
M |
0.00% |
4.81% |
10.83% |
17.81% |
25.75% |
34.72% |
44.83% |
56.02% |
68.47% |
82.13% |
96.57% | |
EMPLOY |
0.00% |
2.78% |
3.78% |
3.50% |
2.13% |
-0.29% |
-3.77% |
-8.41% |
-14.37% |
-21.89% |
-31.44% | |
LAB |
0.00% |
2.77% |
3.77% |
3.50% |
2.11% |
-0.28% |
-3.77% |
-8.41% |
-14.36% |
-21.88% |
-31.43% | |
PROPR |
0.00% |
2.83% |
3.64% |
3.64% |
2.02% |
-0.40% |
-3.64% |
-8.50% |
-14.17% |
-21.86% |
-31.58% | |
CAP |
0.00% |
2.77% |
3.77% |
3.47% |
2.12% |
-0.29% |
-3.77% |
-8.42% |
-14.37% |
-21.91% |
-31.45% | |
WOOD Products |
X |
0.00% |
-3.82% |
-8.72% |
-14.29% |
-20.36% |
-26.84% |
-33.68% |
-40.86% |
-48.38% |
-56.31% |
-64.78% |
XD |
0.00% |
-1.96% |
-4.51% |
-7.43% |
-10.70% |
-14.25% |
-18.13% |
-22.32% |
-26.96% |
-32.13% |
-38.16% | |
XXD |
0.00% |
-1.96% |
-4.51% |
-7.43% |
-10.71% |
-14.25% |
-18.13% |
-22.33% |
-26.96% |
-32.14% |
-38.17% | |
Q |
0.00% |
-1.38% |
-3.17% |
-5.19% |
-7.43% |
-9.82% |
-12.35% |
-15.02% |
-17.86% |
-20.86% |
-24.07% | |
PX |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% | |
PD |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
2.00% |
2.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% | |
PDD |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
0.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
1.00% |
2.00% |
2.00% |
3.00% |
4.00% | |
E |
0.00% |
-4.16% |
-9.47% |
-15.51% |
-22.09% |
-29.09% |
-36.47% |
-44.18% |
-52.23% |
-60.67% |
-69.60% | |
M |
0.00% |
-0.61% |
-1.39% |
-2.22% |
-3.08% |
-3.91% |
-4.66% |
-5.30% |
-5.75% |
-5.86% |
-5.33% | |
EMPLOY |
0.00% |
-4.62% |
-10.48% |
-17.07% |
-24.14% |
-31.56% |
-39.25% |
-47.13% |
-55.17% |
-63.38% |
-71.81% | |
LAB |
0.00% |
-4.63% |
-10.48% |
-17.07% |
-24.14% |
-31.57% |
-39.25% |
-47.12% |
-55.17% |
-63.38% |
-71.81% | |
PROPR |
0.00% |
-4.69% |
-10.55% |
-17.09% |
-24.12% |
-31.49% |
-39.20% |
-47.07% |
-55.11% |
-63.32% |
-71.86% | |
CAP |
0.00% |
-4.64% |
-10.51% |
-17.08% |
-24.17% |
-31.52% |
-39.23% |
-47.11% |
-55.17% |
-63.40% |
-71.80% | |
Regional H ousehold Income Affects | ||||||||||||
Low |
0.00% |
-0.02% |
-0.06% |
-0.10% |
-0.15% |
-0.21% |
-0.27% |
-0.33% |
-0.40% |
-0.48% |
-0.57% | |
Medium |
0.00% |
-0.10% |
-0.26% |
-0.45% |
-0.67% |
-0.91% |
-1.18% |
-1.46% |
-1.77% |
-2.10% |
-2.47% | |
High |
0.00% |
-0.11% |
-0.29% |
-0.50% |
-0.75% |
-1.02% |
-1.32% |
-1.64% |
-1.99% |
-2.37% |
-2.79% |
Note: Allowed harvest levels are calculated as a percent of baseline level (FS), thus 0.9*FS indicates the allowed cut is 90 percent of the base level.
21
More intriguing information
1. Studies on association of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi with gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus and its effect on improvement of sorghum bicolor (L.)2. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Fiscal Reform and Monetary Union in West Africa
5. New urban settlements in Belarus: some trends and changes
6. Psychological Aspects of Market Crashes
7. The name is absent
8. On the origin of the cumulative semantic inhibition effect
9. Ex post analysis of the regional impacts of major infrastructure: the Channel Tunnel 10 years on.
10. FISCAL CONSOLIDATION AND DECENTRALISATION: A TALE OF TWO TIERS