Figure 2. Farm diversification
1992
■ 90-100% □ 75-89.9% □ 50-74.9% □ Less than 50%
1997
■ 90-100% □ 75-89.9% □ 50-74.9% □ Less than 50%
2002
■ 90-100% □ 75-89.9% □ 50-74.9% □ Less than 50%
24
More intriguing information
1. SOME ISSUES IN LAND TENURE, OWNERSHIP AND CONTROL IN DISPERSED VS. CONCENTRATED AGRICULTURE2. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
3. Improving behaviour classification consistency: a technique from biological taxonomy
4. Picture recognition in animals and humans
5. The name is absent
6. BEN CHOI & YANBING CHEN
7. Modelling the Effects of Public Support to Small Firms in the UK - Paradise Gained?
8. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
9. An Economic Analysis of Fresh Fruit and Vegetable Consumption: Implications for Overweight and Obesity among Higher- and Lower-Income Consumers
10. The name is absent