Table 1: 1992 Agricultural sales range, median, and sample distribution moments
for cohorts
|
Cohort |
Range |
Median ($1,000) |
Mean ($1,000) |
Standard |
Skewness Coefficient |
Kurtosis Coefficient |
|
Л |
<37∏ |
^25 |
^24 |
10 |
-0.32 |
1.32 |
|
"2 |
37-58 |
“48 |
18 |
1 |
-0.04 |
0.98 |
|
58-76 |
“67 |
IT |
"6 |
-0.02 |
1.07 | |
|
76-94 |
"85 |
"85 |
"6 |
0.00 |
1.04 | |
|
^5 |
94-114 |
104 |
104 |
"6 |
0.04 |
1.22 |
|
"6 |
114-136 |
124 |
125 |
1 |
0.05 |
1.26 |
|
7∏ |
136-169 |
151 |
152 |
10 |
0.14 |
1.40 |
|
^8 |
169-221 |
192 |
193 |
15 |
0.17 |
IH |
|
"9 |
221-330 |
“262 |
167 |
H |
0.37 |
1.97 |
|
10 |
> 330 |
190 |
^777 |
"940 |
9.05 |
169.07 |
a Sample size: 73,406. Data source: Agricultural Census, (USDA, 1992)
25
More intriguing information
1. Fertility in Developing Countries2. Indirect Effects of Pesticide Regulation and the Food Quality Protection Act
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. The name is absent
6. INSTITUTIONS AND PRICE TRANSMISSION IN THE VIETNAMESE HOG MARKET
7. The name is absent
8. PEER-REVIEWED FINAL EDITED VERSION OF ARTICLE PRIOR TO PUBLICATION
9. Improving Business Cycle Forecasts’ Accuracy - What Can We Learn from Past Errors?
10. La mobilité de la main-d'œuvre en Europe : le rôle des caractéristiques individuelles et de l'hétérogénéité entre pays