Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies



Table 2: 1997 and 2002 Agricultural sales range width, median, and sample

distribution moments for incumbent cohorts a

Cohort

Range
Width
($1,000)

Median
($1,000)

Mean
($1,000)

Standard
Deviation
($1,000)

Skewness

Coefficient

Kurtosis

Coefficient

1997 Census

1

1,644

22

32

52

9.7

223.6

2

1,771

45

51

55

9.0

209.9

3

2,306

66

71

68

11.0

284.4

4

1,921

85

91

73

7.1

123.9

5

1,940

104

108

75

5.7

95.9

6

2,522

126

131

88

6.9

137.3

7

2,390

151

160

107

5.4

73.6

8

3,500

193

204

130

6.0

100.9

9

3,229

270

288

177

4.1

42.9

10

30,384

553

925

1,258

6.6

89.5

2002 Census

1

2,000

15

31

73

7.8

172.1

2

1,725

37

50

81

6.5

99.8

3

2,056

55

67

96

5.8

84.5

4

5,020

77

88

131

15.7

530.5

5

3,472

93

106

122

7.0

151.4

6

4,312

115

129

162

9.3

185.7

7

3,410

143

163

188

4.9

53.6

8

4,920

183

207

223

5.8

85.0

9

8,750

256

307

357

6.9

110.3

10

42,322

551

1013

1578

7.1

131.5

a Sample size

;: 66,333 in 1997, 41,369 in 2002

. Data source:

Agricultural Census

(USDA, 1997, 2002)

26



More intriguing information

1. Natural hazard mitigation in Southern California
2. Searching Threshold Inflation for India
3. Estimating the Economic Value of Specific Characteristics Associated with Angus Bulls Sold at Auction
4. RETAIL SALES: DO THEY MEAN REDUCED EXPENDITURES? GERMAN GROCERY EVIDENCE
5. Who runs the IFIs?
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. Notes on an Endogenous Growth Model with two Capital Stocks II: The Stochastic Case
9. The name is absent
10. Discourse Patterns in First Language Use at Hcme and Second Language Learning at School: an Ethnographic Approach