Do the Largest Firms Grow the Fastest? The Case of U.S. Dairies



Table 2: 1997 and 2002 Agricultural sales range width, median, and sample

distribution moments for incumbent cohorts a

Cohort

Range
Width
($1,000)

Median
($1,000)

Mean
($1,000)

Standard
Deviation
($1,000)

Skewness

Coefficient

Kurtosis

Coefficient

1997 Census

1

1,644

22

32

52

9.7

223.6

2

1,771

45

51

55

9.0

209.9

3

2,306

66

71

68

11.0

284.4

4

1,921

85

91

73

7.1

123.9

5

1,940

104

108

75

5.7

95.9

6

2,522

126

131

88

6.9

137.3

7

2,390

151

160

107

5.4

73.6

8

3,500

193

204

130

6.0

100.9

9

3,229

270

288

177

4.1

42.9

10

30,384

553

925

1,258

6.6

89.5

2002 Census

1

2,000

15

31

73

7.8

172.1

2

1,725

37

50

81

6.5

99.8

3

2,056

55

67

96

5.8

84.5

4

5,020

77

88

131

15.7

530.5

5

3,472

93

106

122

7.0

151.4

6

4,312

115

129

162

9.3

185.7

7

3,410

143

163

188

4.9

53.6

8

4,920

183

207

223

5.8

85.0

9

8,750

256

307

357

6.9

110.3

10

42,322

551

1013

1578

7.1

131.5

a Sample size

;: 66,333 in 1997, 41,369 in 2002

. Data source:

Agricultural Census

(USDA, 1997, 2002)

26



More intriguing information

1. THE DIGITAL DIVIDE: COMPUTER USE, BASIC SKILLS AND EMPLOYMENT
2. The Folklore of Sorting Algorithms
3. The name is absent
4. The name is absent
5. Auctions in an outcome-based payment scheme to reward ecological services in agriculture – Conception, implementation and results
6. Using Surveys Effectively: What are Impact Surveys?
7. TOWARD CULTURAL ONCOLOGY: THE EVOLUTIONARY INFORMATION DYNAMICS OF CANCER
8. The Structure Performance Hypothesis and The Efficient Structure Performance Hypothesis-Revisited: The Case of Agribusiness Commodity and Food Products Truck Carriers in the South
9. The name is absent
10. Change in firm population and spatial variations: The case of Turkey