Table 4: Distribution of farms among sales categories
a
|
Census |
Agricultural Revenue from Milk |
Farm Size of Incumbents |
New Entrants | ||
|
Medium (Cohorts 5-9) |
Large (Cohort 10) |
1997 |
2002 | ||
|
90-100% |
35.7 |
448 | |||
|
75-89.9% |
40.0 |
34.2 | |||
|
1992 |
50-74.9% |
24.3 |
21.0 | ||
|
<50% |
0 |
0 | |||
|
90-100% |
38.8 |
475 |
46.0 | ||
|
75-89.9% |
26.8 |
25.3 |
30.8 | ||
|
1997 |
50-74.9% |
16.8 |
14.1 |
23.2 | |
|
<50% |
17.6 |
13.1 |
0 | ||
|
90-100% |
28.1 |
420 |
325 |
44.7 | |
|
75-89.9% |
26.0 |
23.1 |
26.4 |
36.3 | |
|
2002 |
50-74.9% |
12.0 |
10.6 |
11.1 |
19.1 |
|
<50% |
33.9 |
24.3 |
30.0 |
0 | |
a Data source: Agricultural Census (USDA, 1992, 1997, 2002)
28
More intriguing information
1. Long-Term Capital Movements2. The name is absent
3. Commuting in multinodal urban systems: An empirical comparison of three alternative models
4. Developmental changes in the theta response system: a single sweep analysis
5. Biological Control of Giant Reed (Arundo donax): Economic Aspects
6. An Efficient Circulant MIMO Equalizer for CDMA Downlink: Algorithm and VLSI Architecture
7. The name is absent
8. The Impact of Cognitive versus Affective Aspects on Consumer Usage of Financial Service Delivery Channels
9. Imperfect competition and congestion in the City
10. Consumption Behaviour in Zambia: The Link to Poverty Alleviation?