Appendix B: Details of studies included in the review (not screening tools)
|
Item |
Country |
Study design |
Population features |
Features of intervention |
Mode, provider and setting |
Type of |
|
Fujii et al. |
Japan |
Outcome |
Age Children Young people Adults Gender Mixed sex |
What is being assessed? What is offered to the young Not stated / unclear |
What is the mode of the assessment? Questionnaire What is the mode of the assessment? Consultation / interview Who provides the intervention? Public health nurses Parent / carer Intervention site Primary education Secondary education |
Effectiveness |
|
Gadomski et |
USA |
Single group |
Age Young people Gender Mixed sex Other information Data presented on |
What is being assessed? Behavioural measures What is offered to the young Referral into health system |
What is the mode of the assessment? Questionnaire Who provides the intervention? Health professional - unspecified Intervention site Health care unit |
Effectiveness |
A scoping review of the evidence relevant to life checks for young people aged 9 to 14 years
51
More intriguing information
1. Word Sense Disambiguation by Web Mining for Word Co-occurrence Probabilities2. Industrial Cores and Peripheries in Brazil
3. Housing Market in Malaga: An Application of the Hedonic Methodology
4. NATURAL RESOURCE SUPPLY CONSTRAINTS AND REGIONAL ECONOMIC ANALYSIS: A COMPUTABLE GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM APPROACH
5. Gender and headship in the twenty-first century
6. The name is absent
7. Performance - Complexity Comparison of Receivers for a LTE MIMO–OFDM System
8. The name is absent
9. The name is absent
10. Accurate, fast and stable denoising source separation algorithms