Table 7. Awareness, Internal Hypothetical Bias and External Hypothetical Bias Calibration Factors
Panel A. NRP Revenue Predictions
Revenue Type |
Predicted NRP Revenue ($65 × Millions of Households Purchasing NRP) | |||
RDD Sample |
NPF Sample | |||
Non-Parametric |
Parametric |
Non-Parametric |
Parametric | |
w/out Awareness Correction |
491.14 |
254.63 |
0.88 |
1.40 |
w/ Awareness Correction |
187.63 |
102.75 |
0.85 |
1.35 |
w/ Awareness & IHB |
143.48 |
22.34 |
0.54 |
1.03 |
w/ EHB Correction |
30.00 |
30.00 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
Panel B. Scaling Factors
Scaling Factor: “NRP Revenues are Divided by a Factor of
Calibration Type |
RDD Sample |
NPF Sample | ||
Non-Parametric |
Parametric |
Non-Parametric |
Parametric | |
Awareness Bias |
2.62 |
2.48 |
1.04 |
1.04 |
Internal Hypothetical Bias |
1.31 |
4.60 |
1.57 |
1.31 |
External Hypothetical Bias |
4.78 |
0.74 |
0.54 |
1.03 |
Total Bias |
16.41 |
8.44 |
0.88 |
1.40 |
Notes. IHB = Internal Hypothetical Bias; EHB = External Hypothetical Bias.
32
More intriguing information
1. IMMIGRATION POLICY AND THE AGRICULTURAL LABOR MARKET: THE EFFECT ON JOB DURATION2. Reversal of Fortune: Macroeconomic Policy, International Finance, and Banking in Japan
3. The English Examining Boards: Their route from independence to government outsourcing agencies
4. The Functions of Postpartum Depression
5. Cross border cooperation –promoter of tourism development
6. Incorporating global skills within UK higher education of engineers
7. The name is absent
8. APPLYING BIOSOLIDS: ISSUES FOR VIRGINIA AGRICULTURE
9. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
10. The Shepherd Sinfonia