Valuing Access to our Public Lands: A Unique Public Good Pricing Experiment



Table 8. Predicted Revenue and Number of Pass Holders (Non-Parametric Estimates)

RDD Sample

NPF Sample

Price

Predicted
Number of
Pass Holders
(in thousands)

NRP Revenue
(millions of $)

Gate Revenue
(millions of $)

Predicted
Number of
Pass Holders
(in thousands)

NRP Revenue
(millions of $)

Gate Revenue
(millions of $)

15

2,698.2

40.5

137.9

41,414

0.62

0.11

25

1,828.4

45.7

155.2

39,609

0.99

0.15

35

1,207.1

42.2

173.8

35,133

1.23

0.28

45

603.6

27.2

198.0

27,610

1.24

0.59

55

497.0

27.3

203.8

20,989

1.15

0.92

65

461.5

30.0

205.8

15,385

1.00

1.25

75

319.5

24.0

216.1

12,940

0.97

1.42

85

284.0

24.1

218.8

9,667

0.82

1.68

95

248.5

23.6

222.1

7,335

0.70

1.89

105

213.0

22.4

225.7

4,965

0.52

2.13

115

88.8

10.2

239.6

3,987

0.46

2.23

125

71.0

8.9

241.8

2,972

0.37

2.36

135

53.3

7.2

244.2

2,520

0.34

2.42

145

17.8

2.6

249.3

1,881

0.27

2.51

155

17.8

2.8

249.3

1,241

0.19

2.60

165

0

0

252.1

1,091

0.18

2.63

175

0

0

252.1

828

0.14

2.67

185

0

0

252.1

715

0.13

2.69

195

0

0

252.1

489

0.10

2.73

205

0

0

252.1

226

0.05

2.79

215

0

0

252.1

226

0.05

2.79

225

0

0

252.1

113

0.03

2.81

235

0

0

252.1

113

0.03

2.81

245

0

0

252.1

113

0.03

2.81

255

0

0

252.1

75

0.02

2.82

265

0

0

252.1

75

0.02

2.82

275

0

0

252.1

0

0

2.84

Notes. For simplicity, price points at the extremes of the bid range are excluded. RDD survey data have been
calibrated to reflect $30 million in NRP revenue at $65, based on current annual pass sales. NPF survey data have
been calibrated to reflect $1 million in NRP revenue at $65, based on estimated NPP and GEP sales to former

purchasers through NPF. Revenue and pass holder figures are calculated using the midpoint of the WTP interval.
Households that state “YES” to both bids are assigned a WTP equal to $10 plus the highest bid. For the RDD
sample, 67 protest households have been omitted, leaving a sample size of N = 462. For the NPF sample, 30
protest households have been omitted, leaving a sample size of N = 1461.

33



More intriguing information

1. The urban sprawl dynamics: does a neural network understand the spatial logic better than a cellular automata?
2. The name is absent
3. Human Rights Violations by the Executive: Complicity of the Judiciary in Cameroon?
4. The name is absent
5. Gianluigi Zenti, President, Academia Barilla SpA - The Changing Consumer: Demanding but Predictable
6. The name is absent
7. ESTIMATION OF EFFICIENT REGRESSION MODELS FOR APPLIED AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS RESEARCH
8. Quelles politiques de développement durable au Mali et à Madagascar ?
9. Firm Creation, Firm Evolution and Clusters in Chile’s Dynamic Wine Sector: Evidence from the Colchagua and Casablanca Regions
10. Philosophical Perspectives on Trustworthiness and Open-mindedness as Professional Virtues for the Practice of Nursing: Implications for he Moral Education of Nurses
11. Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States
12. Parallel and overlapping Human Immunodeficiency Virus, Hepatitis B and C virus Infections among pregnant women in the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja, Nigeria
13. EXECUTIVE SUMMARIES
14. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
15. The name is absent
16. DIVERSITY OF RURAL PLACES - TEXAS
17. Synthesis and biological activity of α-galactosyl ceramide KRN7000 and galactosyl (α1→2) galactosyl ceramide
18. Deprivation Analysis in Declining Inner City Residential Areas: A Case Study From Izmir, Turkey.
19. Fighting windmills? EU industrial interests and global climate negotiations
20. PRIORITIES IN THE CHANGING WORLD OF AGRICULTURE