Problems of operationalizing the concept of a cost-of-living index



Ad 1: It is useful to consider homothetic21 or linear homogeneous utility
functions as an interesting and convenient sub-set of utility functions. A
function
g(xγ, ...,xn) is called homogeneous of degree r if

g(λχ-ι,..., λχn) = λrg(x1, ...,xn).                        (6)

The analytic merit of linear (r = 1) homogeneity is that

c (p, u) = uc(p) = f (q)c(p^                      (7)

where c(p) =c (p, 1) is the “unit cost function” (minimum cost to ac-
quire a utility level of u = 1)22 which provides an enormous simplification.
Homotheticity implies that the COLI is independent of the utility level and
therefore the same for all income classes. Moreover all goods have unitary in-
come elasticities, Engel curves (consumed quantities
q as function of income)
are straight lines through the origin23 and expenditure shares
wi (i = 1,.., N)
are unaffected by changes in income (they are - as desired in the COLI the-
ory - solely reflective of changes in relative prices). However, there is “an
overwhelming amount of empirical evidence contradicting homotheticity of
preferences” ([4]Barnett (1983), p. 218), so that the assumption of homo-
theticity is generally regarded as highly unrealistic. On the other hand the
assumption is extremely convenient. Just as the value index
Vot is decom-
posed in a price and quantity index,
Pot and Qot respectively

vot = ^t^ = po∕.qo∕.,                             (8)

pOqo

called “product test”, or weak factor reversal test24, and in a similar
manner V
ot is usually factored in the economic index as follows

21It is common to make a distinction between “homothetic” and “non-homothetic”
utility functions. A utility function f is defined (by Shephard) as homothetic if it can
be written as a monotonic transformation of a linearly homogeneous function. However
for all practical purposes it is tolerable to use “homothetic” and “linear homogeneous” as
synonyms (like [16]Diewert did, p.6, footnote 8; this seems to be justified, see also [21]Kats
(1970)).

22Diewert has shown that c(p) and /(q) satisfy the same regularity conditions.

23In this respect “quasi-homothetic” preferences are more general in the fact that the
Engel curves “need not be forced through the origin” ([4]Barnett (1983), p.217).

24The (strict) factor reversal test requires the same functional form for P and Q (in-
terchanging prices p and quantities q in the price index P results in the quantity index Q
and vice versa).

13



More intriguing information

1. EU Preferential Partners in Search of New Policy Strategies for Agriculture: The Case of Citrus Sector in Trinidad and Tobago
2. The economic value of food labels: A lab experiment on safer infant milk formula
3. The name is absent
4. The use of formal education in Denmark 1980-1992
5. The name is absent
6. The name is absent
7. The name is absent
8. INTERPERSONAL RELATIONS AND GROUP PROCESSES
9. The name is absent
10. Peer Reviewed, Open Access, Free
11. Ventas callejeras y espacio público: efectos sobre el comercio de Bogotá
12. The name is absent
13. The bank lending channel of monetary policy: identification and estimation using Portuguese micro bank data
14. The name is absent
15. Research Design, as Independent of Methods
16. Secondary stress in Brazilian Portuguese: the interplay between production and perception studies
17. The name is absent
18. The name is absent
19. The name is absent
20. Campanile Orchestra