Table 5: LR test of the linear restrictions of the QUAIDS
model 1: symmetry and homogeneity restrictions
model 2: only homogeneity restrictions
model 3: no restrictions
|
Modell |
<lln |
log lik.2> |
ddfŋ |
LR |
p-value |
sig. 1> | |
|
1988 |
1 |
60 |
12,649.86 | ||||
|
2 |
88 |
12,672.38 |
28 |
45.04 |
0.0219 |
** | |
|
1988 |
1 |
60 |
12,649.86 | ||||
|
3 |
96 |
12,676.81 |
36 |
53.90 |
0.0280 |
** | |
|
1993 |
1 |
60 |
7,711.36 | ||||
|
2 |
88 |
7,727.61 |
28 |
32.50 |
0.2548 | ||
|
1993 |
1 |
60 |
7,711.36 | ||||
|
3 |
96 |
7,736.91 |
36 |
51.10 |
0.0491 |
** | |
|
1998 |
1 |
60 |
4,754.24 | ||||
|
2 |
88 |
4,775.68 |
28 |
42.88 |
0.0358 |
** | |
|
1998 |
1 |
60 |
4,754.24 | ||||
|
3 |
96 |
4,783.80 |
36 |
59.12 |
0.0089 |
*** | |
|
2003 |
1 |
60 |
3,494.32 | ||||
|
2 |
88 |
3,516.31 |
28 |
43.98 |
0.0279 |
** | |
|
2003 |
1 |
60 |
3,494.32 | ||||
|
3 |
96 |
3,523.93 |
36 |
59.22 |
0.0087 |
*** | |
ŋ degrees of freedom
2) log likelihood value
L difference between degrees of freedom of the two models
4) level of significance: * = 0.1, **=0.05, ***=0.01
43
More intriguing information
1. LOCAL PROGRAMS AND ACTIVITIES TO HELP FARM PEOPLE ADJUST2. The Importance of Global Shocks for National Policymakers: Rising Challenges for Central Banks
3. Stakeholder Activism, Managerial Entrenchment, and the Congruence of Interests between Shareholders and Stakeholders
4. Understanding the (relative) fall and rise of construction wages
5. The name is absent
6. Investment in Next Generation Networks and the Role of Regulation: A Real Option Approach
7. Who runs the IFIs?
8. Determinants of Household Health Expenditure: Case of Urban Orissa
9. The name is absent
10. The name is absent