Table 7: LR of the AIDS vs. the QUAIDS
model 1: AIDS with symmetry and homogeneity restrictions
model 2: QUAIDS with symmetry and homogeneity restrictions
|
Modell |
df4 |
log lik.2> |
ddf3) |
LR |
p -value sig.4 |
|
1988 1 |
52 |
12,641.22 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
12,649.86 |
8 |
17.28 |
0.0273 ** |
|
1993 1 |
52 |
7,708.46 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
7,711.36 |
8 |
5.80 |
0.6696 |
|
1998 1 |
52 |
4,738.93 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
4,754.24 |
8 |
30.62 |
0.0001 *** |
|
2003 1 |
52 |
3,475.45 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
3,494.32 |
8 |
37.74 |
0.0000 *** |
4 degrees of freedom
4 log likelihood value
3 difference between degrees of freedom of the two models
4) level of significance: * = 0.1, **=0.05, ***=0.01
45
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Female Empowerment: Impact of a Commitment Savings Product in the Philippines
3. The name is absent
4. Ability grouping in the secondary school: attitudes of teachers of practically based subjects
5. Corporate Taxation and Multinational Activity
6. DETERMINANTS OF FOOD AWAY FROM HOME AMONG AFRICAN-AMERICANS
7. Banking Supervision in Integrated Financial Markets: Implications for the EU
8. Mortality study of 18 000 patients treated with omeprazole
9. ARE VOLATILITY EXPECTATIONS CHARACTERIZED BY REGIME SHIFTS? EVIDENCE FROM IMPLIED VOLATILITY INDICES
10. Who’s afraid of critical race theory in education? a reply to Mike Cole’s ‘The color-line and the class struggle’