Table 7: LR of the AIDS vs. the QUAIDS
model 1: AIDS with symmetry and homogeneity restrictions
model 2: QUAIDS with symmetry and homogeneity restrictions
|
Modell |
df4 |
log lik.2> |
ddf3) |
LR |
p -value sig.4 |
|
1988 1 |
52 |
12,641.22 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
12,649.86 |
8 |
17.28 |
0.0273 ** |
|
1993 1 |
52 |
7,708.46 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
7,711.36 |
8 |
5.80 |
0.6696 |
|
1998 1 |
52 |
4,738.93 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
4,754.24 |
8 |
30.62 |
0.0001 *** |
|
2003 1 |
52 |
3,475.45 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
3,494.32 |
8 |
37.74 |
0.0000 *** |
4 degrees of freedom
4 log likelihood value
3 difference between degrees of freedom of the two models
4) level of significance: * = 0.1, **=0.05, ***=0.01
45
More intriguing information
1. THE CO-EVOLUTION OF MATTER AND CONSCIOUSNESS12. The name is absent
3. The name is absent
4. Special and Differential Treatment in the WTO Agricultural Negotiations
5. Retirement and the Poverty of the Elderly in Portugal
6. The name is absent
7. MATHEMATICS AS AN EXACT AND PRECISE LANGUAGE OF NATURE
8. The name is absent
9. Nonparametric cointegration analysis
10. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour