Table 7: LR of the AIDS vs. the QUAIDS
model 1: AIDS with symmetry and homogeneity restrictions
model 2: QUAIDS with symmetry and homogeneity restrictions
|
Modell |
df4 |
log lik.2> |
ddf3) |
LR |
p -value sig.4 |
|
1988 1 |
52 |
12,641.22 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
12,649.86 |
8 |
17.28 |
0.0273 ** |
|
1993 1 |
52 |
7,708.46 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
7,711.36 |
8 |
5.80 |
0.6696 |
|
1998 1 |
52 |
4,738.93 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
4,754.24 |
8 |
30.62 |
0.0001 *** |
|
2003 1 |
52 |
3,475.45 | |||
|
2 |
60 |
3,494.32 |
8 |
37.74 |
0.0000 *** |
4 degrees of freedom
4 log likelihood value
3 difference between degrees of freedom of the two models
4) level of significance: * = 0.1, **=0.05, ***=0.01
45
More intriguing information
1. An Estimated DSGE Model of the Indian Economy.2. The name is absent
3. Restructuring of industrial economies in countries in transition: Experience of Ukraine
4. ‘I’m so much more myself now, coming back to work’ - working class mothers, paid work and childcare.
5. A model-free approach to delta hedging
6. The name is absent
7. Testing the Information Matrix Equality with Robust Estimators
8. BARRIERS TO EFFICIENCY AND THE PRIVATIZATION OF TOWNSHIP-VILLAGE ENTERPRISES
9. WP 92 - An overview of women's work and employment in Azerbaijan
10. Income Taxation when Markets are Incomplete