Table 6: percentage of observations not violating the monotonicity and con-
cavity conditions
|
data set |
model |
monotonicity |
concavity | |
|
fitted |
oberserved | |||
|
1988 |
AIDS |
100% |
0% |
0% |
|
QUAIDS |
100% |
0% |
0% | |
|
1993 |
AIDS |
100% |
0.158% |
0% |
|
QUAIDS |
100% |
1.738% |
0% | |
|
1998 |
AIDS |
100% |
7.635% |
0.246% |
|
QUAIDS |
100% |
5.665% |
0.248% | |
|
2003 |
AIDS |
100% |
5.068% |
1.351% |
|
QUAIDS |
100% |
2.703% |
3.378% | |
44
More intriguing information
1. The name is absent2. Tariff Escalation and Invasive Species Risk
3. Tissue Tracking Imaging for Identifying the Origin of Idiopathic Ventricular Arrhythmias: A New Role of Cardiac Ultrasound in Electrophysiology
4. Detecting Multiple Breaks in Financial Market Volatility Dynamics
5. Governance Control Mechanisms in Portuguese Agricultural Credit Cooperatives
6. Educational Inequalities Among School Leavers in Ireland 1979-1994
7. Education Responses to Climate Change and Quality: Two Parts of the Same Agenda?
8. Une Gestion des ressources humaines à l'interface des organisations : vers une GRH territoriale ?
9. A simple enquiry on heterogeneous lending rates and lending behaviour
10. The name is absent